Michael, thanks so much!

Great advice. Here's the tutorial I promised. Let me know if there's anything wrong or I could've done better. Thanks again!

Hi Chipp, looks good, thanks for posting the tutorial.

Just a couple of comments - when you select the edges for the blend you can actually select them in whatever order you want, blend will automatically sort them as needed. Not that it's bad to select them in order though, it just isn't required.

And also when you go to do "Add sync points", you can keep adding in as many pairs of point as you need just with one click of the "Add sync points" button, you don't need to push "Done" and click the button again after every individual pair.

- Michael

Nicely done Chipp :)

Martin
(TpwUK)

Thanks Michael and everyone for your help in figuring this out.

FWIW, I believe this is more than just a 'ridge' exercise, but a way in which anyone can add any type of continuous blended element in an already created surface.

Here's another cool use for this same technique:

Hi Chipp, that's looking good! Yes, using Flow for the construction tends to be more general purpose.

- Michael

Hi Michael,

Yes, Flow is great, but it doens't create perfect continuous geometry unless you use your double trim / blend technique. Thanks again for sharing that gem!

tricky!

Hey chippwalters,

"Flow doesnt produce a perfect continuous surface"

It will work much better if you make the base surface more of a replica of the target surface...

I had some ideas on this but will be away for another week or so... mostly i wanted to try to use a fillet on the compound surface to get the curve, as opposed to a straight offset...

"It will work much better if you make the base surface more of a replica of the target surface..."

Not exactly sure what is meant here. As far as I can tell, the base surface is a rectangle; the same as the target surface. Only one is bent and the other is not.
Perhaps what you're saying to to try and create the the base surface from the target surface, then edit it? If so, I suspect there still may be a slight continuity issue.

"""""Not exactly sure what is meant here. """""

It has to do with flow analysing the 2 surface structures... When they are disparate, then the result can be distorted a bit...

SO like is the rectangle edges and size the same as the target edges and size? (for 2d) For the 3d surface, the actual structure of the underlying surface matters too. So the target surface, turn on the points for it, then look at the points for the base surface....

There are some demos on the forum that demonstrate the topic.... I am away in cali so can't really get into it too much...

Burrman,

Thanks for that. How do I turn on the points for a surface? I thought I could only do that with edges. Thanks!

Unjoined surfaces will show points. So once you trim that target surface out, and its seperate, you can turn on points for it.. you will notice it has the same points as the full surface too... at this point you can also run ShrinkTrimmedSrf to shrink the underlying surface to a minimal representation.

Nice video Chipp, thanks for taking the time.

Flow is a most useful tool, I don't use it enough!

Marc

Nice tutorial Chipp!

Sometimes you have to go with the 'flow'. ;-)