NGon WIP
 1-14  15-34  35-54  55-74  75-94  95-103

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
162.55 In reply to 162.54 
Hi Thorsten,

> here is another file to try your updated obj exporter.
> as you can see it messes up a lot when I export it,

Thanks for the sample! Here is what it looks like with n-gons: (Also .obj file attached)




> PS:
> By the way when can we expect a new version with the quad only export?

Well, it's not actually quad only, it is an "n-gon" only option where there will be polygons that have any number of sides, not just 4. But I think that there will also be more organized quads in the quad+triangle output as well.

There is still a fair amount of work to do on it, looks like it might be about a week or so before a new version with it is ready.

- Michael

EDITED: 15 Feb 2007 by MICHAEL GIBSON

Attachments:

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Thor (MCHANNEMANN)
162.56 In reply to 162.55 
Thnx a mil Michael,

I'm looking forward to it, some objects work fine by now already,
another thing very handy would be if we can export each object group with a different poly amount setting,
I had an nice spanish chair where I needed more details in the seat part and when I added it there the frame
was going insanly detailed and boosting the object from 8k polys to 50k polys.

Just a thought from myself

Regards,

Thor

PS:

It would be nice to have some kind of material setting like just colours and maybe transparency :-D
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
162.57 In reply to 162.56 
> another thing very handy would be if we can export each object group
> with a different poly amount setting, I had an nice spanish chair where I
> needed more details in the seat part and when I added it there the frame
> was going insanly detailed and boosting the object from 8k polys to 50k polys.

This should be improved quite a large amount with the new meshing system as well - it's actually what I've been working on most recently.

With the new system, the density will increase much more gradually. When you want to add a little bit more detail it shouldn't increase in such large jumps elsewhere as the current beta does.

So this should hopefully reduce the need to set a bunch of different settings per object. But we'll see, when the new beta is available let me know if you still run into situations where it is a problem.

If you happen to have that spanish chair handy, if you post it I can give it a test.


> It would be nice to have some kind of material setting like just colours and
> maybe transparency :-D

Yup, this will happen eventually. I'm not sure exactly when.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Thor (MCHANNEMANN)
162.58 
Hi Michael here it is :-D
Attachments:

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
162.59 In reply to 162.58 
> Hi Michael here it is :-D

Hi Thor, thanks, I can see the problem in the mesh there. Do you have the original .3dm file that you created the mesh from? If you can post that I will try meshing it with the new mesher to see if that problem is indeed reduced or not.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Thor (MCHANNEMANN)
162.60 In reply to 162.59 
Sorry Michael,

I picked the wrong file....

here it is,

enjoy,
THor
Attachments:

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
162.61 In reply to 162.60 
Attached is what this looks like with the current new mesher. It seems better to me, what do you think?

There is one major area that is not handled completely - larger areas that have rather subtle shallow curves may not pick up as much detail as you would want. I might try a couple of ideas on fixing this part up too.

- Michael
Attachments:

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Thor (MCHANNEMANN)
162.62 
Thnx Michael,

it looks now far more like what I had in mind :-D

Thor
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Thor (MCHANNEMANN)
162.63 
Hi Michael,

maybe this helps you a bit:
http://graphics.cs.uiuc.edu/~garland/papers/ssq.pdf

Best regards,

Thor
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
162.64 In reply to 162.63 
> maybe this helps you a bit:
> http://graphics.cs.uiuc.edu/~garland/papers/ssq.pdf

Hi Thor, it's very interesting, but it is a method that builds a quad mesh from a triangle mesh.

I'd expect this kind of functionality to be added to whatever program you're using that works on meshes. I'm probably not going to add a lot of mesh to mesh processing type functionality into MoI.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Schbeurd
162.65 
Did you notice the Moai statue on page 7 of the PDF ? ;-)))
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
162.66 In reply to 162.65 
Yes, Moai is everywhere, it's the new wave :D
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
162.67 In reply to 162.66 
I'm still in the process of working on the vertex alignment for ngons. It's one of those things where it seems like every step uncovers two more steps of other stuff before it is done. But it is moving along.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Crusoe the Painter (CRUSOE)
162.68 In reply to 162.64 
Actually, it samples surface shape/topology So while the examples that paper is using are triangular meshes being turned into quads, it could be working with nurbs too. There is another paper by the same author on user-directed remeshing that yields models with good edge flows ( Needed for 3D animation ). Basically a automated version of Silo's topo brush.

Both would be killer features. Don't dismiss them because the examples are tri based. :)
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
162.69 In reply to 162.68 
> Both would be killer features. Don't dismiss them because the examples are tri based. :)

Don't get me wrong, I don't doubt that they would be useful. But reading a research paper and making a fully functioning production ready implementation are two totally different things...

It's just far beyond the scope of what I will be able to accomplish anytime soon.

Since the technology is not specific to NURBS and works on triangle meshes, why wouldn't you want to have this functionality available inside a polygon modeler where you might be importing a bunch of other triangle-based models already? It seems like it would be a lot more useful and more general purpose if it was implemented over there rather than only as a specialized NURBS export option.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Thor (MCHANNEMANN)
162.70 
I`ll check that with the silo guys :-D

Thnx for the tip Michael,

Thorsten
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
162.71 
I still have a bunch of things to fix, but ngons with aligned vertices are starting to work, here are a couple of tests (Steph's cannon and church). There is still some work to do, for instance there are some messed up parts on the interior walls of the church, but this should give a good idea of how it's going to work.

Now ngons that are adjacent to one another will share the same points along trim curve boundaries.

So it would be good to know if this is better than the previous versions.


These have no texture coordinates, I temporarily removed those to reduce file size.

I also removed the text on the floor of the church - several of the letters had some small extra loops in them which interferes with the meshing. If Steph has the original curves for these it would be good to know if the loops were in the original curves, or if they were created due to some bug in a trim or boolean operation.







Edit: removed church one, there seems to be some problems in the original model.

- Michael

EDITED: 25 Aug 2008 by MICHAEL GIBSON

Attachments:

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
162.72 In reply to 162.71 
Transmited to Steph :)
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
162.73 

For Michael
just for infos
here an obj files (I believe in ngons) it's a free model from Zbrush
http://forums.polyloop.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=15859&d=1161737136 (80 kb zip)
and a transform (not by me) by Amapi 7.5.1 Obj --> Nurbs (format a3p & Iges works for moi :)
the normal 3dm export from Amapi was not possible due Internal error :(
http://forums.polyloop.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=15861&d=1161768655 (1 meg Zip )
I know that is the inverse of your transformation but maybe that can help :)

EDITED: 25 Oct 2006 by PILOU

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
162.74 In reply to 162.71 

From Steph
The letters of the floor Church were simple Text curves (format 3dm) from Rhino 3D imported in Moi
Extrude + Chamfer ---> seems that gives problem :)

For the Gun : points are not yet "auto welded", good matching surfaces, all normals are in the same way :)

For the church : here an Avi video with some bugs:) http://stephlx.free.fr/MoI/bugObj.avi 13 meg :)

For the Old Door : after export Obj in C4D no possibility to "auto weld" points of the fence, too numerous points, no enough Ram !!! (2 Gigas:)

Various complaints :)
Infinite grid on the "2D views"
Scale Tool ( I suppose 1/100, 1/1000...or unity cm, m, inch ...) ?
Text cotation (?)

EDITED: 25 Oct 2006 by PILOU

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged
 

Reply to All Reply to All

 

 
Show messages:  1-14  15-34  35-54  55-74  75-94  95-103