Marvelous Insects

Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
9551.1 

EDITED: 30 Oct 2019 by PILOU

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
9551.2 
Here the model OBJ was Decimated by 90% but always some heavy! :)
By Digital Archive of Natural History

EDITED: 30 Oct 2019 by PILOU

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
9551.3 In reply to 9551.2 
Hi Pilou, it looks like that is a triangle mesh object, not one that is structured as a sub-d object. So it won't really convert very well with the sub-d converter which expects to process a sub-d control cage.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  PaQ
9551.4 
Could be a good candidate for one this new quad remesher posted in the other thread.
I would be curious how the poly flow will look like.
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
9551.5 In reply to 9551.3 
<< triangle mesh object

I have totally forgotten this apect of the problem! :)

So what is best : quadrangulate then decimate or decimate then quadrangulate ?

PS when i said 90% it's a big Decimation! (10% will be quasi no decimation)

Here the model OBJ
https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/graphosoma-lineatum-59fa16902b924d26bde9e626c76bb28d#download

EDITED: 30 Oct 2019 by PILOU

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
9551.6 In reply to 9551.5 
Hi Pilou,

> So what is best : quadrangulate then decimate or decimate then quadrangulate ?

It depends on the quadrangulation method. Some of them can incorporate polygon reduction built into them so in that case you would probably not do any separate decimation.

You probably would not want to do decimation afterwards though, if you were to use it probably use it before.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
9551.7 
So with ZRemesher of ZBrush always the same Insect by Digital Archive of Natural History

27 000 polys to 13 800

Inside ZBrush





Very speed to reload inside Moi by SubDiv as they are quadrangulated!
Many more easy manipulable (even it's an 94 Megs 3DM file! ;)
http://moiscript.weebly.com/uploads/3/9/3/8/3938813/insectok.zip (3DM 88 meg)
The OBJ quadrangulated is 950 KB ;)
http://moiscript.weebly.com/uploads/3/9/3/8/3938813/pm3d_graphosoma1.obj



The Importation inside Moi with Import OBJ take a little more time (3-4 times the SubDiv) but works also!



Always with the Free SimLab Composer Lite ;)

EDITED: 3 Nov 2019 by PILOU

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
 From:  mkdm
9551.8 In reply to 9551.7 
Very very good result!!!

- Marco (mkdm)
My Procreate portfolio
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged
 

Reply to All Reply to All