Filleting issues
All
1-2
3-6
From:
mkdm
14 Dec 2017 (3 of 6)
8737.3
In reply to
8737.2
Hello Michael.
@You : "...One thing to note is that the surfaces involved in the pocket are a lot more complex than they seem..."
Hmmm....very interesting...
@You : "...I'd probably recommend doing a boolean of a box to make this indentation instead of Inset..."
Many thanks for your help! :)
@You : "...Did you need any help to finish the model? It sounded like you were able to get a good result on it from Rhino..."
You already helped me with your reply.
Usually I much prefer to use Moi over Rhino :)
Thanks. I will let you know the results with the fillets after the boolean operation.
-
Marco
(
mkdm
)
Reply
More
Post Options
Reply as PM
Print
Mark as unread
Relationship
IP
Logged
From:
mkdm
14 Dec 2017 (4 of 6)
8737.4
In reply to
8737.2
Perfect Michael!!!
Applying the fillet after the boolean, instead after the inset, works !!
Thanks a lot!
Strange thing anyway :)
-
Marco
(
mkdm
)
Reply
More
Post Options
Reply as PM
Print
Mark as unread
Relationship
IP
Logged
From:
Michael Gibson
14 Dec 2017 (5 of 6)
8737.5
In reply to
8737.4
Hi Marco, I'm glad that works!
So the reason why Inset uses offset surfaces for it's "side walls" is so that there can be a constant wall thickness for the general case, here's a bit of an exaggerated example:
The wall thickness goes like this:
- Michael
Attachments:
marco_inset1.jpg
marco_inset2.jpg
marco_inset3.jpg
Reply
More
Post Options
Reply as PM
Print
Mark as unread
Relationship
IP
Logged
From:
mkdm
14 Dec 2017 (6 of 6)
8737.6
In reply to
8737.5
Thanks a lot for such a detailed info.
Ciao!
-
Marco
(
mkdm
)
Reply
More
Post Options
Reply as PM
Print
Mark as unread
Relationship
IP
Logged
Reply to All
Show messages:
All
1-2
3-6