Baris has another fillet question. :)
All  1  2-10

Previous
Next
 From:  BurrMan
8457.2 In reply to 8457.1 
Hey Baris,
There's a limitation of the fillet engine handling that fillet folding over on itself.

You could choose a fillet size that fits, like a .145

You could look at the result of deleting that little patch and adding an nsided patch there. But our nsided is still lacking in a few more options to match tangencies and curvatures with the connecting edges.
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Baris
8457.3 In reply to 8457.2 
Hi BurrMan, thank you. I'll give nsided a try.
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Baris
8457.4 In reply to 8457.2 
Nsided almost gave me what I wanted but I couldn't get it right 100%. One edge had a weird bump. So I opted for a smaller fillet side like you suggested. I'm sure there is a million things wrong with my work to all the trained eyes here, but this is how it looks:






Thank you BurrMan.

Baris
Attachments:

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  OSTexo
8457.5 
Hello Baris,

What is the ideal fillet size you were looking for?
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Baris
8457.6 In reply to 8457.5 
Hi OSTexo. I wanted to have a smoother transition from the center X shape to the sphere body of the drone. Any value beyond 0.145 causes fillets to overlap. The desired look is similar to this:



I'm still happy with what I could achieve with MoI. Learned a ton and I'm doing stuff which I haven't been able to do so easily in Cinema 4D. :) This is how my work looks with some quick texturing:


  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  PaQ
8457.7 In reply to 8457.6 
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Baris
8457.8 In reply to 8457.7 
Mind = Blown. I have to experiment with that tonight. Thank you PaQ!
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
8457.9 
PaQ President! ;)
---
Pilou
Is beautiful that please without concept!
My Gallery
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
 From:  BurrMan
8457.10 In reply to 8457.6 
Here's also a quick look at how you can blend disparate shapes...



The end result STILL has some stresses in the surface, but I chose a pretty large gap. You could use smaller gaps to get better blends. I also used extreme values. where we went from .145 to 1!

Also, the starting shape, doesn't lend itself to "beautifully melted transforms". that shape could be adjust to get a more organic look, if that's what someone wanted.

Anyway, This was just an add.... your model looks good AS IS!

EDITED: 10 Jun 2017 by BURRMAN

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged
 

Reply to All Reply to All

 

 
 
Show messages: All  1  2-10