Real case OBJ to Nurbs!
 1-19  20-33

Previous
Next
 From:  mkdm
8095.20 In reply to 8095.19 
Thank you for the clarification, STEFAN.

Nice day,

- Marco (mkdm)
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  amur (STEFAN)
8095.21 
Here is a link, in case you like to see or try out new features:

http://www.masterviacad.com/index.html

Regards
Stefan
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  mkdm
8095.22 
Hi everyone,

...Anyway....regarding all the job "Obj to Nurbs"...

It's clear that all the efforts are justified only if it should happen that it's necessary to carry out additional manipulations of the obj model
inside the Nurbs environment (for example booleans, filleting, trimmings, blending etc..) and we want to treat the original obj as a real Nurbs object.

Otherwise, if we don't need to do those stuff, all those efforts are totally useless.

Nice day,

- Marco (mkdm)
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  mkdm
8095.23 
Hi everyone,

That's a meaningless doodle made in 15 minutes for fun.
Simple "Obj to Burbs" workflow, made by using Max's ImportObj + SubDiv scripts and doing some little nurbs modelling (fillet, trim, boolean).

Here's all the links :

Scree cap 1 : Moi's whole model : http://take.ms/GJeLu

Scree cap 2 : Nurbs main actor : http://take.ms/FGZiW

Scree cap 3 : Imported obj from NVIL : http://take.ms/YPP7w

File 1 : Zipped whole 3dm file : http://take.ms/KWpSk

File 2 : Low-poly obj from NVIL : http://take.ms/N0gMB

Nice day,

- Marco (mkdm)
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
8095.24 
Another Workflow! :)
Rocket 3F (OBJ)-->Fusion 360 Tsplines (IGES)---> Moi (3DM) = Nurbs
(i know that is a direct bridge Rocket --> Moi : it was for see what happend inside Fusion! :)
Artifacts' lines on the top round is just due to the bad angle position of the view!


Rendering Fusion 360 till Moi has one! ;)
(absolutly not any regulates anywhere)

EDITED: 21 Sep 2016 by PILOU

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  mkdm
8095.25 In reply to 8095.24 
Hi Pilou,

Et voilĂ ...Moi's jewelry!

Funny!

- Marco (mkdm)
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  mkdm
8095.26 
Hi everyone,

...and that's a 10 minutes job with 3DCoat.
A random painting, sculpting, and rough renderings of the "Obj to Nurbs" objects of my previous post.
(http://moi3d.com/forum/index.php?webtag=MOI&msg=8095.23)

Large view
http://take.ms/Ag3Tm

Detailed view
http://take.ms/BiLig

Nice day,

- Marco (mkdm)
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
8095.27 
Big size indeed!
Any idea of the time of the rendering itself?
---
Pilou
Is beautiful that please without concept!
My Gallery
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  mkdm
8095.28 In reply to 8095.27 
About 7-8 min of total render time in 3DCoat (for all renderings).

...the complete job took 13-14 min...not 10 :)

Ciao Pilou!

- Marco (mkdm)

EDITED: 21 Sep 2016 by MKDM

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  PaQ
8095.29 In reply to 8095.17 
Hi Marco,

Sorry for the delay,

About the surface 'complexity'

Once you have a patch simplification in the conversion process (like with T-Spline for Fusion or Rhino, Cyborg3D, etc),
pre-subdivide the mesh before converting it will change nothing about patches arrangement. In other words you will get the same numbers of patches,
they will just have more 'points' in the underlying structure. And what is important, is to reduce the number of patches, to help smooth further modeling task (trim, fillets, etc).

So yes for the moment it might concern you with max script ... but not so much if you are using other conversion tools.

By hiding vertex, I mean fighting with the poly topology to avoid nasty placement of those poles. It require a bit of modeling practice.

++
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  mkdm
8095.30 In reply to 8095.29 
Hi PaQ,

And thanks for your reply.

> Once you have a patch simplification in the conversion process (like with T-Spline for Fusion or Rhino, Cyborg3D, etc),
> pre-subdivide the mesh before converting it will change nothing about patches arrangement.
> In other words you will get the same numbers of patches, they will just have more 'points' in the underlying structure.
> And what is important, is to reduce the number of patches, to help smooth further modeling task (trim, fillets, etc).

I agree with you but unfortunately, I don't have a commercial version of T-Spline, and frankly I don't like it so much.
(And I don't use Fusion).

I much prefer Clayoo and I tested it for a while but it's too much expensive...

But for the moment, in order to use Max's SubdDiv, I'm testing reverse SubDiv tools of NVIL and, in general,
I'm trying to model using only quads.
For this particular case, where I don't arrive with my hands, 3DCoat really helps me, with its retopo tools.

> By hiding vertex, I mean fighting with the poly topology to avoid nasty placement of those poles. It require a bit of modeling practice.

I don't know if I already have that modeling practice. Could you please post some screenshot or some simple .obj file,
that shows what you said ?

Thanks a lot and have a nice day.

- Marco (mkdm)
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  PaQ
8095.31 In reply to 8095.30 
Hi Marco,


For instance to can avoid the ugly top pole pinch from you test model with a topology like this ?
Attachments:

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  mkdm
8095.32 In reply to 8095.31 
Hi PaQ,

> For instance to can avoid the ugly top pole pinch from you test model with a topology like this ?

OK. Now I understood what you said.

In certain situations I already do that type of topology.

For example here's a link of my NVIL screen cap of a simple sphere.
http://take.ms/XLkdR

But I know that the challenge is to do manually that type of topology...

Thanks for your suggestion.

Ciao!

- Marco (mkdm)
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
 From:  mkdm
8095.33 
Hi everyone,

After testing more deeply T-Spline within Fusion 360, I decided to include it into my current workflow,
when I need to convert Low Poly Quads into Nurbs object.

I will use "convert" feature of T-Spline, inside the "Sculpt" room in Fusion, in order to obtain a Nurbs object,
with a fewer number of patches compared to what we can actually get with (always very good) Max's SubDiv.

Nice day,

- Marco (mkdm)
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged
 

Reply to All Reply to All

 

 
 
Show messages:  1-19  20-33