>I was not aware that same amount of edges should be used, so far it always worked, pure luck I guess.

No, you certain can Blend (between two un-touching selections) with mismatching numbers of adjacent edges.

Hi Michael, I was (now with this release) intermittently having an issue blending between two single edges that happened to touch on one or both ends.
This is how I would do the "scalloped" blend fix on the ends of my "transitioned recess surface" procedure.
Sometimes it still works, but many times it doesn't now, where I am still able to make it work in V2.
Do you have plans to see if a new bug was introduced?

Could it be possible to ensure that the Blend is still performed - in the case, if only two edges are selected, even if they are touching?
This way, the same original functionality of Blend would coincide with the new and improved version.

Hi Mike,

> Do you have plans to see if a new bug was introduced?

Yup, it's still on my list of things to look at before releasing the next beta, I'm going to get to that list once the hidden line stuff is complete.


> Could it be possible to ensure that the Blend is still performed - in the case, if only two edges are
> selected, even if they are touching?

Yes, this is actually what was intended to happen. There must be a bug that's preventing this from happening currently.

- Michael

Thank you!