It does exist!
All  1-4  5-6

Previous
Next
 From:  Mike K4ICY (MAJIKMIKE)
5536.5 In reply to 5536.4 
Sure! Though, the Dyson vacs are a bit primitive for me, so I think I would consider adding other design factors such as the ability to transform. ;-)

Yes, I've take close looks at the Dyson's at the store. The Target stores here love to carry the whole line. They're popular here in the states.
I feel the plastics used in them are kind of chintzy, which is a turnoff for me.

My wife really wants one, but they charge Apple Mc prices for them... not an option then. They must work really well if they can command those higher prices.

So half of their innovations must lie in the "eye candy" factor.


However, the Dyson toilet could be considered a novelty!



Funny!


Dyson came out with a "non-buffeting" fan that doesn't have a visible blade. It's really an internal motor that's reminiscent of one in a vacuum cleaner.
It uses a more consistent turbine air handling method, like a mini version of a central air system. The air is directed of a type of airfoil shape that sends it in a general direction. It doesn't "buffet" like a spinning blade does, but you should still be getting vortices due to pressure/speed invariances.
They have two kinds, one that is a circle and the other is a elongated shape. After studying the principal workings of their fan, the round shape isn't necessary, all you need is a long blade with the feed point distributed in the middle and at the sides... yes, my mind contemplates these oddities.


But then again, their products look cool, and that's half of why we buy them.


:-)
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
 From:  blowlamp
5536.6 In reply to 5536.5 
I wouldn't touch one with a barge-pole. I don't trust anything that has to try that hard to get noticed.

The best engineered cleaner I've owned - and still own, is a Sebo X1 Automatic. It looks like it was designed around two or three block primitives rather that a rocket engine, but its so reliable it's just not true.

Looking forward to whatever you come up with next.


Martin (2).
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged
 

Reply to All Reply to All

 

 
 
Show messages: All  1-4  5-6