modeling discussion
All  1-6  7-15

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
5098.7 
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  BurrMan
5098.8 In reply to 5098.7 
Hi Frenchy,
If you use a cylinder to do the boolean cut that is depicted with the cone, then that lower edge is a conic created that can be exactly duplicated with the conic tool. But the other edges are not constructed properly by the intersection of the cylinders in the other planes..

If you cut the surface with a cone, then there is no conic there.

Is this what you meant?
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  BurrMan
5098.9 In reply to 5098.8 
So if you use a cylinder as the cutting object, you will find conics




If you use a cone as the cutting object, there will be no conic

EDITED: 19 Jun 2012 by BURRMAN

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
5098.10 In reply to 5098.9 
Yeah usually the definition of a conic section is a curve formed by the intersection of a cone and a plane, with different angles of the plane making different types of conic curves.

If you are intersecting things other than a cone and a plane then you may not generate a conic section curve as output, although they still might be generated if you have things arranged in particular ways.

Does that all answer your question Pilou?

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  bemfarmer
5098.11 
Nice model.
Google search came up with "Intersection of quadrics"
There is a QI program and 4 research papers. http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/18/60/89/PDF/JSC1.pdf
(Google each of the 4 research paper titles to find them.)

The little "parabolic" looking curve is not an ellipse, not a conic, and is not planar... it is a "second order curve...."



  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
5098.12 
Thanks, that is more clear now! :)
---
Pilou
Is beautiful that please without concept!
My Gallery
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  BurrMan
5098.13 In reply to 5098.11 
Ah Bemfarmer,
You are the man!



My conic = 0.4653, 0.4652, 0.4333 My curve = 0.4652, 0.4653, .4332

The "non-planar" was the givaway!

It Was a mistake, though it lead me to my solution! I wonder how many of these have created solutions in the past!!!

Thanks for chiming in. :)

EDITED: 19 Jun 2012 by BURRMAN

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
5098.14 In reply to 5098.13 
You have made my last hairs losted! :)
A conic curve is always "flat" :)
---
Pilou
Is beautiful that please without concept!
My Gallery
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
 From:  BurrMan
5098.15 In reply to 5098.14 
Frenchy,

a conic curve is derived from running a plane through a cone at some angle. It will be planar. I suppose a conic who's "view" is planar, but curves out of plane, becomes somthing else.. Maybe bem can be specific.
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged
 

Reply to All Reply to All

 

 
 
Show messages: All  1-6  7-15