Rail revolve question
All  1-9  10

 From:  Michael Gibson
4508.10 In reply to 4508.9 
Hi Felix,

> To me it seems like the Z value where simply not used or discarted
> since in this particular case the curve (rail) was drawn in the XY
> plane with varying Z values, the profile was in YZ plane and the
> revolve axis was in Z.

Yeah I believe that's how the Swung surface method works - I think it bases the weighting factor by the distance from the rail's control point to the center axis which basically has the result of ignoring z values.

> Maybe I should have ask why the command didn't fail, since the
> rail curve wasn't planer?

It's because the geometry library routine that generates these swung surfaces does not give back an error result when given a non-planar rail curve, it just produces the result that you saw.

> I even found that NURBS is much older then I would have
> thought since it was first implemented in Fortran.

Yes, most of the research and base level work comes from the 1960s and 70s.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Reply to All Reply to All


Show messages: All  1-9  10