Flow Test
 1-20  21-40  41-60  61-79

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
4487.21 In reply to 4487.20 
Hi Pilou - Bemfarmer's toroidal knot plug-in here:
http://moi3d.com/forum/index.php?webtag=MOI&msg=4430.1

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
4487.22 
Many thanks!
Damned, this was released in August when I was not here!
So missed!

Ps I have made some publicity around the world of your previous images in some forum 3D :)
(and of course flow Moi function ;)
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
4487.23 
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Mike K4ICY (MAJIKMIKE)
4487.24 In reply to 4487.18 
Holy cats Danperk!! That thing is incredible!

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  danperk (SBEECH)
4487.25 
Thanks Mike, not skill, just trickery. ;)
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  bemfarmer
4487.26 In reply to 4487.21 
Great Flow example!
I've got to try one. I do have Alibre and Keyshot 2, but it only takes .bip format.


The toroidal knot script is about 99% copied from Michaels Toroidal Helix script, with I think, one added parameter.
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
4487.27 
@danperk
Does the rectangular pattern are separated objects or just one object boolean union?
from my tests both is working
but maybe one is best than some?

EDITED: 22 Sep 2011 by PILOU

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  danperk (SBEECH)
4487.28 In reply to 4487.27 
Hi Pilou,

They were separated objects. As you say, both would work but it's easier to modify the pattern as separated items.

I use the CurveLengthV2 script to copy/paste the width/height from destination object to rectangular base object.
From Petr's MoI page:
http://kyticka.webzdarma.cz/3d/moi/
http://plugmoi.voila.net/index.htm

PS. If you wanted to manufacture this object, it would be better to Boolean union the pattern. :)

EDITED: 22 Sep 2011 by SBEECH

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
4487.29 In reply to 4487.28 
Thx for the infos!
---
Pilou
Is beautiful that please without concept!
My Gallery
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  danperk (SBEECH)
4487.30 
vois êtes les bienvenus!

More Toroidal flow madness, captured in Acrobat & comped in Photoshop:

EDITED: 2 May 2023 by SBEECH

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
4487.31 
Remember that i have made with topmod ;)

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  mariomarimba
4487.32 In reply to 4487.1 
danperk

this exercise is excellent. in which program did you render the blue image?
also how you control the density of the pattern applied to the sphere?
could it be twice as dense as on your blue image? ...and how you controle it.
i only had limited chance to play with new tool and for what i do (i am an architect working on large international projects) it seems to be
golden tool. i would appreciate your opinion.
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  christopher foy (CHRISTOPHERFOY)
4487.33 In reply to 4487.1 
how does flow differ from flow along surface in rhino

regards
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
4487.34 In reply to 4487.33 
Hi Christopher,

> how does flow differ from flow along surface in rhino

It's equivalent to the "Flow" and "FlowAlongSrf" commands in Rhino.

The main differences are that in MoI instead of having a separate command for flowing between curves or flowing between surfaces there is just one command that just pays attention to whether you pick a curve or a surface as the initial base object.

Also one other difference is that in the next v3 beta there will be a new "projective" option that will apply the object in a different way - I don't think that Rhino's flow has an exact equivalent of that.

See here for some examples of the new projective option which will be coming to Flow in the next MoI v3 beta:
http://moi3d.com/forum/index.php?webtag=MOI&msg=4471.15

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  danperk (SBEECH)
4487.35 In reply to 4487.32 
Thanks mario, I'm having fun with the new Beta!

>>in which program did you render the blue image?<<

If you mean the second image in my first post it's just a screen capture of an Adobe Acrobat file,
you can download the attached PDF file that's at the bottom of the first post called FlowCelt.PDF.

>>also how you control the density of the pattern applied to the sphere?<<

The pattern density is controlled by the number of copies in the original which you see on the flat plane
you see in the first image-first post.

Here is the same pattern with double the density mapped to the left sphere:

EDITED: 18 Oct 2018 by SBEECH

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  mariomarimba
4487.36 In reply to 4487.35 
danperk

thanks for the reply
do we need to do anything else to have it so perfectly applied to the sphere?
does the size of the flat pattern matter compared to the size of sphere you are applying the pattern to?
i am going to try more now!!

regards

mario
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
4487.37 In reply to 4487.36 
it's more the size of the surface under the start volume or curve behing the start volume who are important for the final result ;)
these gives the pourcentage size of Flow on the surface target surface volume!
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  mariomarimba
4487.38 In reply to 4487.37 
THANKS FRENCHY!!

I AM STILL PLAYING WITH FLOW. i can't say i understand every detail of FLOW and how it works but i am very excited about the tool
and i will crack it. i may have more questions for you in next few days. i am going to bed now...i am in WESTERN AUSTRALIA

regards
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  danperk (SBEECH)
4487.39 In reply to 4487.36 
Hi mario,

>>do we need to do anything else to have it so perfectly applied to the sphere?
does the size of the flat pattern matter compared to the size of sphere you are applying the pattern to?<<

When mapping to a sphere the planes dimensions is a 2:1 ratio (w:h), that only means something at the equator as
the pattern will decline to zero as it approaches the North/South poles. ;)
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  SW03
4487.40 In reply to 4487.39 
» When mapping to a sphere the planes dimensions is a 2:1 ratio (w:h), that only means something at the equator as
the pattern will decline to zero as it approaches the North/South poles. ;) «

Oh, wow, I didn't know it was that simple – I always thought, it had to be someting like (π) for the aspect ratio.. thx for the hint!
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged
 

Reply to All Reply to All

 

 
Show messages:  1-20  21-40  41-60  61-79