controlling sweep positions
All  1-12  13-17

Previous
Next
 From:  Anis
3893.13 In reply to 3893.9 
Hi Michael....

Is there any chance to use LEDAS GEOMETRIC SOLVER in the future, of course it will cost MoI higher.
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
3893.14 In reply to 3893.13 
Hi Anis,

> Is there any chance to use LEDAS GEOMETRIC SOLVER in the future

I don't really know - I just don't have enough information about it to be able to give you a good answer on that.

For example, how much does it cost to license it?

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
3893.15 In reply to 3893.12 
Hi Nos,

> IMO this would be ok cause if something is imported it
> has to be already modelled in the first place, and changes
> should be applied there cause the idea is probably to use
> the imported object a serveral times/places.

I don't think that's a proper assumption that everybody is only going to use imported objects as instances and not as something like a main object body to just do further work on.


> Is it planed to implement instances?

Yes, I do want to have instances at some point.


> Lets say I have an imported object which I use in
> several models. At some point I my have to modify
> it to adapt it to something. So it would be nice if I
> could open the source of the instance/source-file in
> a second window and edit it.

Pulling up a completely separate window is a pretty complex process for something like that. I'd be more inclined to do something much more simple for things like that, such as temporarily hide the other stuff, let you work on the object that you want to edit right in the same window you are already working in, and then when you are done everything else goes back to its previous state.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Anis
3893.16 In reply to 3893.14 
Hi Michael...

As long as I know, some autocad clone use LGS, also some CAM vendor.
Regarding cost, looks like they can provide reasonable cost both for developer and end user.
I think you should discuss further with LGS people. We believe you can develop far more robust and good history and or constraint solver, but here you are one man show. So we hope LGS can speed up development of MoI3D.

Thanks...
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
 From:  adamio
3893.17 
I suspect that LEDAS would be able to offer a better deal than Siemens.

+1 for looking into ledas
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged
 

Reply to All Reply to All

 

 
 
Show messages: All  1-12  13-17