I think he got in hot water for his post. Phil Lunn made another post in his original, that he stands by his original January post, though he leaves out "WEB" version again, which is where I came in for clarity and then was responded to with "like version for like version".

I got pissed not so much at the "serious user" comment (which could be read as less harsh, or how he said he intended) but more his comment after, which inferred Malicious intent and trying to stir up trouble.

The truth is it did stir up trouble for them and "I" shouldnt be using other peoples forums for my personal garbage.

It will be whatever it will be and thats when the word will be spoken. I'm going to stop posting about it and wait and see.

Sorry Michael.