V2 beta Apr-12-2009 available now
 1-20  21-40  41-60  61-80  81-100  101-120  …  201-216

Previous
Next
 From:  DannyT (DANTAS)
2570.61 
Hi Michael,

In regards to styles, once you have the lighting figured out, when we apply a colour to a solid or surface will the edges inherit the colour as well, as it does now, I think it would be more preferable and visually better for the edges to stay the default colour or an option to have the edges stay default or take on the body colour.

-
~Danny~
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
2570.62 In reply to 2570.61 
Hi Danny,

> when we apply a colour to a solid or surface will the edges
> inherit the colour as well,

Yeah that is probably what will happen normally, since when you apply a style to a solid, what happens is that style is assigned to all of its edge and face sub-objects.

You can also assign different styles to some edges and faces if you want, and if edges did not draw in their style color you would not be able to easily see what style the edge has.

Also one benefit of having the edges draw in their style color is that you will be able to see that color when the solid is selected.

But it should not be difficult for me to put in at least an .ini option that would cause edges to be drawn using style 0 (named "default" by default).

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  guneriussen
2570.63 
Michael,

Thanks for the long feedback and explenation, that´s customer service :)

Man you must be one hell of a typist, no hunt an peck method here!
Answering practically everybodys posts is quite a feat.

Regards to my suggestions/requests, there is nothing that is critical to me that I do not already have,
just throwing ideas out. Except maybe the mitered corner sweep (thanks for putting it in V2).

Eric
(the software junkie)
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Marc (TELLIER)
2570.64 
With the inline browser I sometime get double scroll bars, one for all the tabs and one for the browser.
Maybe it could be limited to only one?




Some small details...

I agree with Thomas about the brilliant part and also on the tabs shape topic. Maybe the 'legs' could be smaller and not proportional.
I get a strange impression with the empty space created under the browser in adjacent mode, it's quite large when unexpanded.

Maybe the browser background could stretch down to the viewport length.
Also a line under tabs could help visually separating sections. (see image).











It's a massive improvement on organizing and displaying objects, I didn't had the chance to do a complex project yet but I get the impression this tool will be super-flexible, it sure open ways to manage uber-complex projects!

The sweep motion works great!

I don't know if it's been mentioned, but maybe right clicking on the browser button could open it inline or vice-versa..

Great work!

Marc
Attachments:

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Marc (TELLIER)
2570.65 
I was thinking that I might be a good thing if "types" should be the first Item in the list and expanded by default...

Marc
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Nick (BODINI)
2570.66 
Hi Michael,

Sorry if this has already been reported, but if I read all of these posts to find out, my head will explode. :-)

Anywho, if you create a solid, like a box, then select one of its edges, and change the layer of said edge to some different layer, it kind of gets stuck in limbo and you cant touch it.

Let me know if you need further clarification.

thanks,

Nick
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
2570.67 In reply to 2570.64 
Hi Marc, thanks for the feedback!

> With the inline browser I sometime get double scroll
> bars, one for all the tabs and one for the browser.

What is your monitor's screen resolution?

I think this should not generally happen if you have a pretty high resolution screen, where there is a lot of empty space under the Construct/Transform tools, that's basically where the "inline" mode is meant to be used with.

The inline browser is limited to a maximum size of 40% of the main window's height - any larger than that and it will get its own internal scroll bar. But if that 40% size does not fit you will get the double scroll bar.

You can adjust the percent though in moi.ini, look in the [UI] section, for this:
InlineBrowserMaxPercentHeight=40

Maybe with your screen resolution / UI size, something like 30% limit would work better and limit the browser from going off the bottom of your side pane.


> I agree with Thomas about the brilliant part and also on the
> tabs shape topic. Maybe the 'legs' could be smaller and not
> proportional.

What you show there is similar to what I had earlier, here is the early version (to the left) along side the newer one:



The previous one felt kind of "blocky", but maybe it is a bit better.

The tail part is actually not proportional, which is probably the issue - when your text becomes small the fixed "tail" size can maybe be too long in proportion to the whole header.


> Maybe the browser background could stretch down to the viewport length.

Hmm, I don't know - that would make for different behavior with the other palettes, which have that exact same background only extend to cover their content. For example in your screenshot the bottom palette for Construct/Transform that is collapsed does not have its background stretch down to the bottom of the side pane.


> I get a strange impression with the empty space created
> under the browser in adjacent mode, it's quite large when
> unexpanded.

Hmm, there still seems to be a kind of empty feeling with the one you show there with it extended... It instead looks like a palette with a big empty section within it, which they don't normally have.

That may be hard to avoid the empty feeling when the area is actually empty of stuff.


> Also a line under tabs could help visually separating sections. (see image).

That looks really good! I think I will give that one a try - a little more indentation of the tab part looks good, I was trying to get something similar to that with the longer swoop coming in from the right side and narrowing down, but having an actual divider line rather than a narrow swoop looks better.


> I don't know if it's been mentioned, but maybe right clicking on
> the browser button could open it inline or vice-versa..

Well, the browser button disappears when you switch to inline mode, so that would maybe be a little weird to have the thing you clicked on kind of vaporize.

Probably under normal use (rather than "kicking the tires use") it will not really be frequent to switch between these modes on a rapid basis.

But if for some reason you do want to flip it back and forth quickly, you can set up a keyboard shortcut to do that, use this script as the command part of the shortcut:

script:moi.ui.browserPosition=(moi.ui.browserPosition == 'Adjacent' ? 'Inside' : 'Adjacent');


Thanks for the feedback Marc, I think that your header design looks better, the key thing there is the dividing line does a better job of what I was trying to do just with the sloping tail.

- Michael
Attachments:

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
2570.68 In reply to 2570.66 
Hi Nick,

> Anywho, if you create a solid, like a box, then select
> one of its edges, and change the layer of said edge to
> some different layer, it kind of gets stuck in limbo and
> you cant touch it.

I'm going to need some more details on this one - I can't seem to repeat the problem over here.

There are 2 different ways to set the style, one is by clicking on a style's swatch in the browser, and the other is by using the style flyout menu from the properties panel (where it shows the name, type, and size of the current selected object also).

Does one method work for you but not the other?

And what do you mean that you can't touch it - you mean that it will not select? And do you mean the whole box will not select, or just not that edge?

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Marc (TELLIER)
2570.69 In reply to 2570.67 
Hi Michael, this was experienced at 1440x900.
I often crank up resolution when doing more elaborate work.

""For example in your screenshot the bottom palette for Construct/Transform that is collapsed does not have its background stretch down to the bottom of the side pane.""

Yes it was just the combined effect of the two spaces, Nothing too dramatic here...

""Probably under normal use (rather than "kicking the tires use")""

Right :-)


I did not noticed the button disappears when inline.


Marc
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
2570.70 In reply to 2570.69 
Hi Marc,

> Hi Michael, this was experienced at 1440x900.

Yeah the "inline" mode is not really designed to be used in lower than 1200 vertical pixel resolution or so.

It won't really fit well if there is not plenty of vertical space available - it's meant to be used with systems where there was previously a large open space under the "Construct/Transform" tools even when all palettes were open.

It may work with a lower resolution system if you lower the maximum percentage height to be quite a bit lower than the default, like maybe 15 or 20% instead of the default 40% height limit, but that means it will be limited to a pretty small exposed area with quite a lot of scrolling needed inside of it to get to various things. It is generally intended to use the "adjacent" mode instead for lower vertical resolutions.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
2570.71 
Not yet tested but...
does it possible to have a little video with the functions of the Object system? ;)
(because yet 70 messages to read :)
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
2570.72 In reply to 2570.71 
Hi Pilou, see this particular message:
http://moi3d.com/forum/index.php?webtag=MOI&msg=2570.18

for an overview of how it works, like what actions are available, etc...

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael T. (MICTU_UTCIM)
2570.73 
Thanks again Michael G. !!!

I look forward to testing this out!

Michael T.
Michael Tuttle a.k.a. mictu http://www.coroflot.com/fish317537
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Brian (BWTR)
2570.74 In reply to 2570.73 
Michael
Thanks for that thread sellection you gave for Pilou.

As I have said before I can not see a great value of it for me--at this point in time!

However , the list of the other modifications in this Beta would be appreciated. (Have I missed it?)

Maybe put on a separate thread?

Brian
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Nick (BODINI)
2570.75 In reply to 2570.68 
Hi Michael,

Sorry I was vague on the details of my report. I figured you'd say 'yes, i know'. ;-)

-Nick

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
2570.76 In reply to 2570.74 
Hi Brian,

> However , the list of the other modifications in this
> Beta would be appreciated. (Have I missed it?)

I almost have it done, should be ready with that a bit later tonight.

There is quite a bit of other stuff actually, and a lot of bug fixes.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
2570.77 In reply to 2570.75 
Hi Nick - I see what you mean now, sorry I did not know it involved hiding the solid part.

Yes that is a problem currently that if the parent solid of an edge is hidden, then the you can't select that edge with the mouse.

That's actually been a limitation for quite a while but before now it was not quite so easy to hide everything else other than one edge. So it is kind of more noticeable now.

You can get out of that problem by showing the solid, once it is shown then you should be able to select the edge as usual. For now that is the workaround but I think I will be fixing this one up.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Nick (BODINI)
2570.78 In reply to 2570.76 
Yeah, sorry I didnt completely describe it properly to you. That Jing gets the job done! ;)
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  DannyT (DANTAS)
2570.79 In reply to 2570.62 
Hi Michael,

> But it should not be difficult for me to put
> in at least an .ini option that would cause
> edges to be drawn using style 0 (named "default" by default).

Perfect! Thanks

-
~Danny~
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  BurrMan
2570.80 In reply to 2570.79 
Is the "single object can belong to more than one Style" still waiting to be implemented?
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged
 

Reply to All Reply to All

 

 
Show messages:  1-20  21-40  41-60  61-80  81-100  101-120  121-140  …  201-216