Knurling
 1-5  6-25  26-32

Previous
Next
 From:  Brian (BWTR)
2072.26 In reply to 2072.25 
I think, seeing people want to make it so hard, that I am better off not using an image at all--like these.

Brian

EDITED: 31 Dec 2008 by BWTR

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
2072.27 In reply to 2072.25 
Hi Pilou,

> Does it possible to apply an displacement image totally
> different of the model?
> like this for example

Generally no - that kind of displacement is typically oriented more towards moving the shape along the surface normal to create things like bumps and indentations, not for creating a completely different form.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
2072.28 In reply to 2072.24 
> Well renderman is really great with all that stuffs, there is no
> render time difference between a bump or a real displacement
> map ... it's really super fast.
> The wrong side is a super slow raytracing :'(

Back a while ago some guys had an interesting project where they captured the polygon output from a RenderMan renderer (I think maybe AIR?) to get the kind of baked version of the geometry and then used it for STL / Rapid prototyping.

So it kind of allowed for shader-driven details but with mesh generation. For stuff like Knurling or dimples on shoe soles, etc... I think it was called GeoDump but they don't seem to have the page for it anymore. :(


> Btw do you have any plan in mind for rendering solution
> inside MoI for the future (MoI 8.0 ? :))

No real finalized plans yet, but it will probably start to get some attention in v3 I think.

My current thinking is that I may write a very simple and quick renderer that will be built in to do very basic stuff, but rely more on plug-ins / 3rd party type renderers for more advanced type things.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  jbshorty
2072.29 In reply to 2072.28 
>Back a while ago some guys had an interesting project where they captured the polygon >output from a RenderMan renderer (I think maybe AIR?)

That's correct Michael. AIR engine can do this. Also Rhino can do this (not as advanced as AIR yet). And Modo as well. Both AIR and Rhino can displace Nurbs objects directly and output a displaced mesh...

@ Brian - The idea to use a screenshot as displacement map only works if you can grab an image of the screenbuffer (see attached image) looking from the Top viewport. This is great for making quick alphas from 3D models that you can apply to fake "hard modeling" details in your sculpting app, such as gears, wall sockets, etc... Or you can just make a single knurl feature and repeat it as many times as you need in U/V directions in your render engine. This is just simple pyramid made in Photoshop... A tiny bit of blurring may be necessary to get the best displacement effect...

jonah
Image Attachments:
Size: 19.6 KB, Downloaded: 26 times, Dimensions: 256x256px
Size: 96 KB, Downloaded: 48 times, Dimensions: 995x667px
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
2072.30 In reply to 2072.29 
Hi jonah, one of the interesting parts about the AIR mechanism is that it allows for execution of renderman-style shader script programs.

That allows for writing completely custom shaders that actually execute a kind of script code to control the output. It's pretty much the ultimate in flexibility, but of course you have to write code to control it.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Brian (BWTR)
2072.31 In reply to 2072.29 
jonah
Thats what I used of the MoI screen shot idea--and the top view.

Hey!, it worked ok for me! (Gosh, I use colour image files regularly for displacement also--no probs!)

I am thinking more now of just going down the Carrara potentials I showed--not using any image at all. Seems far easier, totally simple and low file size. Why not?

Brian
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
 From:  steve (STEEVE)
2072.32 In reply to 2072.28 
>My current thinking is that I may write a very simple and quick renderer that will be built in to do very basic stuff, but rely more on >plug-ins / 3rd party type renderers for more advanced type things.

That makes a lot of sense to me as well Michael. I've always liked that idea for some reason.

For example, there is an easy sketchup to kerkythea plug in, and Cycas has an inbuilt portal to povray. Though the two systems are a little different.

In both systems, it is possible to set up cameras, lights, materials inside the modeling program. In the first system, the scene is opened in KT and the rendering operation is controlled from there.

In the Cycas system you don't have to talk to povray at all. A very workable range of render settings can be selected from within the modeler. Which may be very good for some users who don't have time to get into the deep subleties of rendering.

Just some thoughts.
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged
 

Reply to All Reply to All

 

 
 
Show messages:  1-5  6-25  26-32