wishes...
 1-14  15-34  35-42

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
1131.15 In reply to 1131.14 
Hi yannada,

> I Think I should seat back and enjoy the ride.

Please don't hesitate to post your wishes! :) I'd rather have more information than less...

Just if something doesn't quite line up with the direction that I currently see MoI going in, I would rather sort of get that out in the open more, that way if a lot of people see problems with it I might be able to hear something about it.


> 1st price tag

I thought this might be a big reason! :) But it is just not a very big motivator for me to do exactly the same stuff as something else just at a lower price...

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  tyglik
1131.16 In reply to 1131.10 
>>Maybe I would just call it "Max chord height"...

I agree with you in that... -Petr
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  tyglik
1131.17 
quote:
stronger fillets operations : for example a fillet with a too high value should produce automatically
the biggest fillet possible, it should not fail.



I agree, it shouldn't fail, but... What is the "biggest fillet possible"? I am posting a 3dm file example with an object on which MoI didn't manage to create a fillet properly. However, I was able to manually trim and edit those surfaces to get a nice result. So from my point of view, fillet should lead to usable result at least...

Petr
Attachments:

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Marc (TELLIER)
1131.18 In reply to 1131.17 
Hi,

Maybe an option to have a 2d fillet gizmo adjuster (there is something like that in Rhino I think) could be great.

Regards,

Marc
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
1131.19 
A cool fillet will be a fillet "along a curve" so with it some versatility possibilities :)
Or better a fillet with 2 curves ! One top, and one down
Here juste one :the straight edge and one curve
---
Pilou
Is beautiful that please without concept!
My Gallery

EDITED: 19 Nov 2007 by PILOU

Attachments:

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  fredrik
1131.20 In reply to 1131.19 
Good idea Pilou!

Filleting is definetely a place where one can think of new solutions.
I whish se to elliptical fillets, where you specify two radiuses for each side of the fillets.

Very nice program, I am impressed,
Fredrik
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Marc (TELLIER)
1131.21 In reply to 1131.19 
Very interesting Concept Pilou!

Regards,

Marc
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
1131.22 In reply to 1131.19 
Hi Pilou, normally that is called a "Variable radius fillet", and it should be something that I can add in. The geometry library that I'm using supports it, I just didn't have time to figure out a UI for it for version 1.

Normally the curve is defined by specifying different radius numbers at spots along the edge, but it is an interesting idea to define it by a profile curve directly like you are showing there, that would be some kind of "scaling rail" type option.

I've added this to the wiki wishlist.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  fredrik
1131.23 In reply to 1131.21 
Just tried the shelling on some basic computer mouse shapes, works like a dream!
One thing i noticed though is that the offset surfaces have many more conrol points than the originals. Could i be possible to have an option fo keeping the same number of points, or at least getting the number down? At the expense of precision off course.

The fillet with G2 is giving good results too, :)

- Fredrik
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
1131.24 In reply to 1131.20 
Hi Fredrik,

> I whish se to elliptical fillets, where you specify two radiuses for each side of the fillets.

I added this one to the wishlist at http://moi3d.com/wiki/wishlist as well.

This one is probably quite a lot more difficult though, the more variables and different factors that come into play, the more difficult it gets to create a clean and simple UI to control them all...

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  fredrik
1131.25 In reply to 1131.24 
Thank you Michael!

Not fot this christmas then, ... it's good to know it is on the list :)

I will try t think of good propsals for new features

Best regards!
- Fredrik
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  3DKiwi
1131.26 
And a suggestion from me.

I would like whatever is selected to remain selected after doing an undo or cancel command. e.g. say you go to do a fillet and for whatever reason you want to go back, when you you press cancel or undo you lose the selection. You then have to go and reselect everything again.

Don't think I've seen this mentioned before.

Cheers
Nigel
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
1131.27 In reply to 1131.23 
Hi Fredrik,

> Could i be possible to have an option fo keeping the same number of points,
> or at least getting the number down? At the expense of precision off course.

I added this to the wishlist as well. It may be a bit difficult to set that up soon though, the geometry library that I'm using is focused more on accuracy for those results.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
1131.28 In reply to 1131.26 
Hi Nigel,

Re: preserve selection for undo/cancel - I think that one should be feasible to get in for V1, I'll see if I can get that tuned up after the final piece of the documentation is finished.

There are some cases where it is actually preserved currently, like for Move or Rotate transformations, but in other cases it isn't like when undoing a fillet. I don't think it should be too difficult to fix up.

Thanks for bringing it up!

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
1131.29 In reply to 1131.18 
Hi Marc,

> Maybe an option to have a 2d fillet gizmo adjuster (there is something like that in Rhino I
> think) could be great.

I added this one to the wishlist page as well.

I had wanted to do something like this originally, but I bailed out on it because it was going to turn into quite a bit of work. Eventually I should be able to get to it.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  tyglik
1131.30 In reply to 1131.27 
Hi Michael,

:: Add Offset ::

I think, it would be a nice example of MoI user-friendly-commands if offset (and also project) command allowed for automatically "rebuilding" curve or surface after running itself. It means, no exactly the same number of points for original curve and new one, like mentioned Frederic, but only minimum points within given rebuild/fit tolerance which could be set up in Moi.ini file - default value would be zero, i.e. no rebuild.

Petr
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Schbeurd
1131.31 In reply to 1131.22 
>>> Hi Pilou, normally that is called a "Variable radius fillet", and it should be something that I can add in. The geometry library that I'm using supports it, I just didn't have time to figure out a UI for it for version 1.
>>> I've added this to the wiki wishlist.

Variable radius fillet : I was planning to add this one on the wishlist. You've done it for me, thanks ! ;-))

Also for me :
- Text along a path (along a curve).
- When using the Array > Dir command, an extra option to choose the placement for the last arrayed object, not the offset point as this is currently the case.
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
1131.32 In reply to 1131.31 
Hi Bernard, I added yours to the wiki as well.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
1131.33 In reply to 1131.30 
Hi Petr, re: automatic rebuild - I guess I could see a "Simplify" checkbox, and if you pushed it some additional UI would appear below it to ask for rebuild parameters... But it also may be better for me to dig into seeing if it is possible to create a more efficient result that is actually still within the regular tolerance.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
1131.34 
Bending an object along a curve (and some "transformers")
A pipe maker
An "explode" function after a "boolean merging operation" for have each object on a 3D grid (that is impossible to make that by hand when objects are more than 10 ;)
Something for manage object (color (?), group(?), arborescence (?)...)
Complete history rebuilding
...
but with all that the V2 mabe will take a certain time to born ;)
---
Pilou
Is beautiful that please without concept!
My Gallery

EDITED: 19 Nov 2007 by PILOU

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged
 

Reply to All Reply to All

 

 
Show messages:  1-14  15-34  35-42