V4 beta Oct-17-2018 available now - SubD to NURBS conversion
 1-10  11-30  31-50  51-70  71-90  91-110  …  251-264
Thread Split: Some posts in this thread have been moved here

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
9100.51 In reply to 9100.48 
Hi Metin,

re:
> I tried a little more complex, but completely manifold, subdivision-ready OBJ file, and it becomes
> a joined surface after importing in MoI using the new Sud-D function.

That's the same "very small faces getting mangled" problem that I was talking about earlier. For now if you have an object that's only about 1 unit across it will run into some problems, scale objects like that up by say 100 times before you do the import.

I've attached the result of scaling your object up by 100 times and this version should now have all joined edges when you import it.



- Michael

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Metin (METIN_SEVEN)
9100.52 In reply to 9100.51 
Hi Michael,

You're right, the upscaled OBJ file becomes a solid after import. I can use that as a workaround until it's fixed.

Thanks,

Metin
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
9100.53 
---
Pilou
Is beautiful that please without concept!
My Moi French Site My Gallery
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Finema
9100.54 In reply to 9100.53 
Thanks Michael for this great feature !
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  pafurijaz
9100.55 In reply to 9100.1 
I do not know how to comment on this new SubD-in Nurbs .. excellent you are the best ..
Maybe when you have time it would be useful to be able to determine in the models imported before conversion which edges should be creased. a bit like it works with FreeShip. here is an old example below. this would allow you to create surfaces with sharp edges like a cube or something..
The ship is converted with edges creased and has a nice sharped nurbs surfaces..

Here the link to sources of Freeship..
https://github.com/markmal/freeship-plus-in-lazarus/releases

EDITED: 19 Oct 2018 by PAFURIJAZ

Image Attachments:
Size: 469 KB, Downloaded: 81 times, Dimensions: 1365x743px
Size: 100.8 KB, Downloaded: 66 times, Dimensions: 1366x744px
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  pafurijaz
9100.56 
And here a file generated with FreeShip from SubD with sharp edges.


EDITED: 4 Nov 2021 by PAFURIJAZ

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  PaQ
9100.57 
Talking about crease, Modo CC crease + mesh freeze works pretty well ! (but it's not sharp crease off course)


EDITED: 23 Mar 2019 by PAQ

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  moujiik
9100.58 
Hi, the new SubD is realy good at modeling cushions. My workflow is modeling in Moi3D, export a sketchup, export obj from sketchup,
and SubD in Moi3D. When i export obj from Moi3D, SubD is not working as expected, whatever kind of obj export. Why that?
Moujiik
Attachments:

Image Attachments:
Size: 87.3 KB, Downloaded: 109 times, Dimensions: 1325x913px
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
9100.59 In reply to 9100.58 
Hi Moujiik, when you export from MoI you should set the option for "Weld vertices along edges" in the expanded dialog options.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  moujiik
9100.60 In reply to 9100.59 
Thank you, the result is just perfect. I was wondering why we don't have the alternative to directely apply SubD to the model,
then i thought it's probably better to ajust some parameters of the obj file? Anyway that's a great tool. Genius!
Image Attachments:
Size: 27.1 KB, Downloaded: 63 times, Dimensions: 705x551px
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
9100.61 In reply to 9100.60 
Hi Moujik, you're welcome I'm glad that worked!

re:
> I was wondering why we don't have the alternative to directely apply SubD to the model

I do want to add that and some other creation methods in the future, the .obj import converter is the first step.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  mkdm
9100.62 In reply to 9100.61 
Hello Michael.

@You : "...I do want to add that and some other creation methods in the future, the .obj import converter is the first step..."

PERFECT!!

Thanks @Moujik :)

I wanted to ask Michael just about these features.

- Marco (mkdm)
My Procreate portfolio
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  amur (STEFAN)
9100.63 
Hi Michael,

i converted my Blobby Cube (with 94156 quads from ZRemesher) to a solid and when i scale the cube from
100x100x100 mm to 200x200x200 mm and then unselect the cube and reselect the cube i have a small scale
discrepancy in the readout menu.

It says now in "Size" 200x199,99x199,99 mm and in the "Edit Size" 200x200x200 mm.

I am wondering now what readout is the correct value? As i figured out this happens also in MoI v3.1.

glitch
image hosting

Best regards
Stefan

P.S. In case you need the model, let me know and i send it to you.

EDITED: 21 Oct 2018 by STEFAN

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  amur (STEFAN)
9100.64 
Hi Michael,

to be sure i run the test again. I exported from Shade3D my Blobby Cube
with the size 100,00x100,00x100,00 mm.

When importing the cube into MoI for subd NURBS conversion i get the
following values, after the conversion:

Size: 99,98x99,98x99,98 mm.

Edit Size:

x: 99,9838
y: 99,9812
z: 99,9794

When doing the subd to NURBS conversion with ViaCAD and then
importing the .sat file into MoI i get the following values:

Size: 100,00x100,00x100,00 mm

Edit Size:

x: 100,0009
y: 100,0007
z: 100,0021

Now comes the part which puzzles me most... I can in MoI of course
uncheck the "Maintain" value and then set the model in x,y,z to 100,0000.

When doing so with the internal MoI model, the values stay, after de-selecting
and moving in the view port and then re-selecting, but when doing so with the
ViaCAD model the values don't stay the same and change every time to a different
value, when repeating this procedure! :-(

I wonder what causes this in MoI, with my ViaCAD model???

I will also mail you the .obj and .sat file from ViaCAD, so you can take
a look.

Best regards
Stefan
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  amur (STEFAN)
9100.65 
O.k: and one more test with Fusion360 and T-Splines.

However i must admit that i did not checked for proper scale settings,
like mm or cm so...

Size: 999,83x999,77x999,78

Edit Size:

x: 999,8378
y: 999,7943
z: 999,8120

Now when doing the same procedure with setting x,y,z to 100,0000
the model size stays the same.

P.S. for those who use macOS Fusion360 needs an OS upgrade by
January 2019, according to an alert, when i logged in to Fusion360.

So this was it then for me with Fusion360 usage, because my old
iMac does not support Mojave and i don plan to buy me a new iMac
soon...

Regards
Stefan
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Przemas
9100.66 
WOW, that's a handy and totally unexpected addition. IMO it takes MoI's worth to another level.
Even if I won't be able to make MoI work under Linux with Nvidia GPU without glitches (https://vimeo.com/296282117) this feature alone will make it a no brainer purchase.
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  amur (STEFAN)
9100.67 
And one more test...

After exporting as ACIS .sat vers. 6 from ViaCAD i could import into Inventor Fusion
and save from there as .step. Now the models dimensions are not correct, but after
changing them in MoI i no longer have this scaling issue.

Now i wonder from others here if they ever encountered the same in MoI...

Regards
Stefan
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  AlexPolo
9100.68 
Hi Michael,

New build is great - just one with the STEP import or Open still getting recursive naming is there a way to fix this?


EDITED: 26 Jan 2020 by ALEXPOLO

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
9100.69 In reply to 9100.63 
Hi Stefan,

re:
> It says now in "Size" 200x199,99x199,99 mm and in the "Edit Size" 200x200x200 mm.
>
> I am wondering now what readout is the correct value? As i figured out this happens also in MoI v3.1.

The one in the "Edit Size" pop out menu is the more accurate one. The one that is shown on top level UI is an approximation based off of the display mesh. Calculating the accurate tight bounding box of a solid can be a potentially time consuming operation and the top level UI changes with every selection.

When you pop out the menu it will do the more detailed and accurate (and slower) calculation at that time.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
9100.70 In reply to 9100.64 
Hi Stefan,

> I wonder what causes this in MoI, with my ViaCAD model???

The bounding box size isn't something that's fundamentally built in to the NURBS definition, it's something that has to be calculated using analysis techniques and a tolerance value.

So various factors are at play, it's just by luck that you see different behavior between those 2 cases I think.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged
 

Reply to All Reply to All

 

 
Show messages:  1-10  11-30  31-50  51-70  71-90  91-110  111-130  …  251-264