Hi shayne, yeah there are some different possible approaches. But since I'm planning on doing a significant overhaul to how history works, it very well might be a kind of "dead end" to do much work on the current system, so at least currently I'm not really prioritizing work that would only apply to the current history system and then not do any good when it's all redone...

Also now that I think about it some more I seem to remember that in addition to the file size issue there was also a problem that the current history system actually only works in the cases where one single object is the output from the command like with a regular sweep for example. With multiple outputs the history system doesn't currently know how to process it.

- Michael