Dave Morrill
All  1-5  6-11

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
4391.6 In reply to 4391.5 
Hi Burr, yeah that kind of registry corruption issue was not really too frequent, but all the same it will be nice not to have to worry about it anymore.


> But I do understand that there are many different types of
> computers/setups/users/other apps.....

Yeah, another issue that has come up occasionally is that some kinds of apps try to hook into mshtml.dll and can alter behavior and cause side effects.


> I think you answered this before. Was it able to keep the
> installation small?

Yeah an increase in installation size is the main negative side effect of having more things built in like this.

But I've managed to keep it under control pretty well - the installer is only about 6MB larger than v2, right now a total size of 16MB. I figure anything under 20MB is really nice and light still.

It was really cool previously to have the installer at around 10MB in size, but that's the part that has been sacrificed.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  BurrMan
4391.7 In reply to 4391.6 
well 16 megs is still pretty banner!!! (And amazing) Thanks.
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  DannyT (DANTAS)
4391.8 
Hi Michael,

> It was really cool previously to have the installer at around 10MB
> in size, but that's the part that has been sacrificed.

I would hardly call it a sacrifice, MoI must be the leanest cad package out there, when you have the likes of the free Autodesk 123D coming in at 525MB and then who knows what disk space it takes up after installation, so I wouldn't kick myself about the 6MB increase, it seems the mentality these days is bigger must be better, you had one customer who thought his download was cut short when he only got 10+MB :)

-
~Danny~
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
4391.9 In reply to 4391.8 
Hi Danny, well "sacrifice" just in the sense that it's the only negative thing that I had to trade off for this new UI system.

But yes, 16MB is still quite extremely lean, particularly in these days when excessive bloat is the norm.

I'm not really worried about a 16MB size, it's just something that I tend to like to keep track of and keep down - to me a low download size is one of the hallmarks of high quality, more carefully crafted software.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  DannyT (DANTAS)
4391.10 In reply to 4391.9 
and carefully crafted it is! :)

Cheers
~Danny~
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
 From:  macray
4391.11 In reply to 4391.9 
[quote] .. to me a low download size is one of the hallmarks of high quality, more carefully crafted software .. [/quote]

not just for you!
I still remember games coming on 2x3,5" floppy disks that were more fun and more creative than things coming nowadays on a DVD. Of course graphics have been improved a lot... Mostly I have the feeling noone cares about file size anymore.

Even 1 photo of my DSLR is bigger than MoI in total. :)

What you see is what you believe - so don't. (from an Amiga500 demo)
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged
 

Reply to All Reply to All

 

 
 
Show messages: All  1-5  6-11