Thank you Michael!!!!

This is awesome! :-D

Hi Mike,

> Easier for Fillets to be figured from multiple connecting
> segments that are more straight, then from tight bends, I guess.

Yeah that can happen - basically when you have all sharp edges being filleted all at once, the fillet mechanism will basically know up front that there will need to be a corner patch built at the spot where the fillet surfaces come together.

If you have some pieces already filleted and then try to fillet more ones that are colliding into those with the same radius, you basically have a lot more little surface pieces involved and that makes things more complex. It will end up trying to do things like building fillet surfaces between some of those already existing fillet surfaces rather than knowing right away to do corner patches instead.

So if you want to put the same radius on everything it can be good to do it all at once rather than some pieces at a time. If you're doing things with different radius values then do the big radius values first and then the smaller ones after.

- Michael

Thanks Michael,
I'm in awe that there is something new (to me) to learn everyday with MoI. Especially when you get into the UI and scripting.
Thanks for the explanation - that actually makes a lot of sense after getting to know NURBS construction a little.

Mike

Hello,
I'm a new user, sorry for the question.. How exactly did you make the cut in the path? see the image
Thank you
Franz

Hi Franz - Select both curves and do a mutual trim, remove the top two lines which will leave a |_| shape, then do a fillet on that shape and you should then get the outline curves you are looking for.

Martin

Hello Martin, many thanks... I didn't understand that I have to select the "entire" joined curved and then Moi asked me to select the vertices... now it looks obviuos...
I have downloaded MoI 2.5 trial some days ago and I'm looking for tutorials and examples to learn t use it. I will continue trying to follow this tutorial, may I ask you something else if (surely) I will need?

thank you
ciao Franz

Just ask away, if I can't help, there are more here who will respond too. Have fun with MoI, it's a wonderful tool, but it does take a little getting used to it, and we all understand that.

Martin

Pekeron, good luck with your learning of MoI!

When I produced my tutorials I was also learning how to use MoI at the same time. There are many smaller procedures that were not included.

Simply post your modeling question to the Forum and someone is sure to tackle it for you.


I have realized that MoI, with all it's simplicity has a lot of subtle rules that are not in any books, but are better learned through experience and use.
It's user interface isn't overloaded with mysterious icons and menus, so it is only as complex as you need it to be according to your level of expertise.
That's one beauty of MoI - it's intuitive enough so that many of the more esoteric procedures and methods for modeling are learned cumulatively by trial and error, and not so much by official instruction or course.
Every few days or so I still learn some new little part of MoI. After a year and all my tutorials, I just recently learned how to use C-Plane and Silhouette.

I'll be making more tuts in good time, but at the moment I'm engrossed in a more complex design/art project. I've been working on it for a month now and the end product is not as close as I'd like it to be.

Hi Mike, yeah that's basically become the primary strategy - trying to get something that hopefully lets you get stuff done initially but that has enough depth that you can gain efficiency with it over time as you learn various nuances.

The tricky part can be that some kinds of models are just inherently more challenging than others, especially ones where there is more stuff swooping around in 3D and not as heavily based off of 2D curve construction. There is just more stuff to absorb for those kinds of things before being able to make things work.

- Michael

Hi all, many thanks for your help:)
I have a problem with the second step. When I Boolean Union the two pieces they don''t become really "united", I can delete one of the part and the first image shows what remains. I have tried also with Merge but the result is the same. I think this is the reason why I can't fillet the intersection.
Franz

Hi Franz, is it possible that one of your objects is not a fully closed solid? When you select them, what does the object type in the upper right area of the window read (in the panel that shows the properties of the current selection) - does it say "Joined srf" or "surface" or "solid".

The result that you show in your screenshot could be the kind of thing that you get when you try to boolean with a not fully closed object, if the intersection does not form a closed loop instead of cutting a spot out it can basically leave an imprint of an inifinitely thin slit instead.

It's hard to know for sure though just by looking at the screenshot - often times if you have a question about a particular situation it can really help if you also post the 3DM model file with actual geometry in it along with your question as well, then it's possible for others to take a look at your objects, zoom in and examine things from different angles, etc...

- Michael

Hi Michael,
the first object (the big one) is a "solid", the second one is a "joined srf". I post the 3dm file, many thanks.
Franz

You have better time to remake your surface in a solid! ;)

As you put the little solid inside the big no matter if the internal curve of the little solid is not absolutly like your first one ;)
Now the boolean Union will works like a charm!



And the fillet a game's boy ;)


Of course I take only one rail from your model, just retake any number you want ;) 2 is the maximum for the rails except the possible third scaling rail ;)
Else you must make your Sweep by parts and merge all at the end!

Hi Franz, thanks for posting the example.

So actually in that case there even though you've got an open surface object and not both solid volumes, since the open surface is sticking all the way through the solid and making a well defined closed intersection curve with it, it is actually supposed to be ok to use in a boolean union like that. But there is a bug in boolean union that is preventing it from working 100% properly, I think it's something that I can fix up for the next v3 beta release.

In the meantime, the boolean union will actually make all the pieces you need, you will just need to manually discard one piece and then join the other pieces together to glue things into a solid.

Here are the steps - select both the objects in your moulinex2.3dm that you posted above, then run Construct > Boolean > Union.

This will calculate a result but it will be fragmented into some pieces. There is one piece that you need to delete manually. To do that select this piece here:



You actually want to keep that piece, but it's in the way so you will need to hide it to more easily get at the actual piece you need to delete which is underneath it.

So push Edit > Hide - that will hide that selected object (if you push Edit > Hide with something selected, if you push it with nothing selected it shows all the hidden objects). So after hiding it you will see this:



That's not actually one single object, it's 2 different objects in separate pieces - select this one here:



And then delete that one. You will see a result like this:




Now show that piece that was hidden earlier, and now you have the proper 2 pieces to make up your solid - select the 2 pieces and use Edit > Join and they will be glued together into a solid.

The bug is that boolean union is supposed to automatically delete pieces like that which are forming a sort of "interior cell wall" between 2 solid regions. But the code that is doing that is getting confused by the "seam edge" of the closed surface and not recognizing it as being a piece fully bounded by all non-manifold edges. Once I fix the bug and take seam edges into account the union calculation should then get the proper result and automatically remove that interior piece as part of the boolean and you won't need to do any extra steps here.

Thanks for posting the file, sometimes the reason why things don't work as expected is because it's a bug that needs to be fixed and it really helps to have the example to work with to find out what's going on!

It is however not necessarily a bad idea to form solids for each piece that you are using to do the booleans - when each part is a solid you know it's a closed object and the booleans will be a little more bulletproof as far as giving you the expected results when the pieces involved are all solids initially.

- Michael

Ciao,
I have built a real solid starting from a closed U profile and now it works fine :)
I continue with other parts, thank you very much.
Franz

Hello, I made some proofs with some holes + fillets. I saw that I have to use a different tecnique depending on the case. If one fails the other one works. See the image.
Ciao, Franz

Hi Franz,

> I saw that I have to use a different tecnique depending on the case. If one fails the other one works. See the image.

Really either method should work, just as long as you have constructed a result that does fully intersect the other object.

If you want some more feedback on the ones that don't work, could you please post a 3DM file with the objects in them so I can test over here and see what's going on?

One tip - it can be easiest to make sure your cutting object extends a bit past just the outer surface of the object to be cut, that way you can be sure that it actually fully divides the object where it cuts into it.

- Michael

Hi Michael,
I will try to replicate the issues then I will upload the file. Thank you very much.
Franz

Hi everybody !

I'm currently learning Moi and am stucked with the 8th step of this tutorial : the inward extrusion.
I've tried with the Extrude and Shell tools but it goes wrong everytime.
After a lot of tries, I have to admit that I'm rather lost and would like to have this step a bit more detailed..

Could someone please help me?
I've attached my 3dm file.


Thank's !

Like this ?