Hi Anis - you write that "the 2 faces already join as a single surface" - but no that's not quite accurate. They join together into a "Joined surface" which is an object made up of several faces joined together. But that's not the same thing as an actual "single surface" which means just 1 face. The way the model structure works each face that you see in the model has its own surface underneath it, so if you have more than 1 face that means that you have more than one surface as well.

So no the surface to surface mapping would not work for applying directly to the penguin belly as you have shown there.

But there are a variety of things you can still do - since that area is mostly curved just in one direction probably a curve to curve flow would work for that area rather than a surface to surface one.

Also you could create a single surface across that area by various techniques like projecting some lines onto there and the lofting them.

Also at some point I want to add in a tool that will let you merge 2 surfaces that share a common natural trim edge into one larger surface.

- Michael

Michael, I have to say - that's sick and twisted! ;-)

I mean, "sick and twisted" in a fiendishly clever and diabolical world taking-over kind of way!

...ohhh, the possibilities.

If you wanted to put type on two surfaces at one like that penguin's belly, could one just cut the type on the plane in two representative sections and wrap them on the two respective surfaces?
Is there some measure to control on where things line up and are positioned once processed?

Anis, Really like the penguin! Some subtle stuff going on with the shape of the body and was wondering how you created it. Care to put together a tutorial?

Hi Mike,

> If you wanted to put type on two surfaces at one like
> that penguin's belly, could one just cut the type on
> the plane in two representative sections and wrap them
> on the two respective surfaces?

Yeah that would probably work.


> Is there some measure to control on where things line up
> and are positioned once processed?

It's controlled by the position of the object inside of the base plane.

For example - position the object so that it touches the edge of the base plane, then the morphed result will touch the edge of the target surface after it is processed.

Position the object in the center of the base plane, and it would go in the center of the target surface, etc...

- Michael

Very good! :-)

Hi Micheal, flow looks awesome!

It's great to see you're back to work on the functions.
Some cool modeling time on the forecast!

Marc

Oh, the anticipation :D

The Flow command keeps getting better and better lol

I am anticipating the introduction of the flow command to be followed by a multitude of requests to control "How it flows and morphs!!" :o

Hi Burr, well the base and target surfaces are what controls it.

It's kind of like texture mapping - objects are mapped from the UV space of the base surface into the UV space of the target surface.

If the target surface has areas where the UV space is compressed or expanded then the shapes will compress or expand in those areas as well.

If you need to have a whole lot of control over it, it may be that you would want to more directly model the output shape rather than using the Flow tool to morph it. But if your target surface is pretty well behaved (like if it doesn't pinch or expand irregularly) then the Flow command should be pretty convenient to use.

- Michael

I'll wonder about "Make a texture map in poly modeler, then use ZSurf to make a NURBS surface of it, then map the ZSurf surface to object.... Whalla!!! Texture mapping in MoI!!! lol

A visit to the aquarium today confirms it.... MoI on the brain!!!!



It's close.... Very close.......:o

(Note the scientific name.... Could it be any more ironic???)

Hi Burr, that process could actually work!

But you could also generate some insanely complex surfaces from it that may bog things down too much.

The surface that ZSurf generates is already pretty heavy itself - if you then try to morph a really pretty heavy surface onto something else, the morphed surface will generally get more complex yet as it will be trying to reconstruct the surface and fitting it to the deformation.

- Michael

Cool another kind of moi! :)

- Michael

Surely as you've stated, it would just be better done in a poly app... (But be sure I'll be trying it! hahahaaaa.)

Wow very cool.

You know in french, Moi mean me.

Hi BurrMan,

maybe you could "morphed" your texture inside ZSurf before getting it in Moi. If I`m not mistaking ZSurf can do that already.

Regards,
Felix

Hi Michael,

is there a kind of feature list of the new command or function you`ll have in V3? (Special interest for somekind of variale fillet and or chamfer command)

By the way, this FLOW thing will be a great addition to Moi.

Keep up the GREAT work.

Thanks

Hi Felix,

> is there a kind of feature list of the new command or function
> you`ll have in V3? (Special interest for somekind of variale fillet
> and or chamfer command)

I don't have a 100% "laid in stone" plan for V3, so there is not anything like specific list of features that will for sure be in there.

I will be trying to get a lot of the stuff that's been requested though, you can see this previous thread for some of the most popular requests:
http://moi3d.com/forum/index.php?webtag=MOI&msg=3628.1

What actually gets developed depends on a lot of things, like how much work is required, how many people are requesting it, and whether or not a good UI design comes to mind easily or whether it would take a long time to do a good UI design. Some of these things are adaptable, like if a lot of people are running into a problem in one area then something to help with that will grow in priority.

I can tell you that variable radius fillet has been requested quite a lot so I do expect to work on that.

- Michael

""""""You know in french, Moi mean me.""""""""

Yes I've heard that.. They pronounce it "Muwha"..

Michael pronounces it "Mow-eye" like the Rapa Nui Statues..

I say "Moy" because thats how we would say it here.. It also means "sleep" over here...

It's pretty cool how it can fit us all!

Hi Michael,

"to do a good UI design" do you mean the MOI UI or the UI for a specific command?

I thought you where done with the new Moi UI or almost...

It seems you went through the requested features and possibly made up some sort of "ordered" list for yourself. I understand you need to study the feasability of those requests but without saying which you intend to give attention or not, is it possible to just have a simple list of all the request that where made. As it is, we have to go through hundreds of messages to figure out what those request are.

This is just a suggestion and maybe someone would volunteer to do it. Say we have a new thread with such a list (maybe with somekind of vote count next to the request) as the first (editable) post. Then every one could just reply with the "votes" and or make a new request. The maintainer of the request list would only have to update the first post with the new vote count and new request if any. I believe something like this could be useful to you and much simpler for us to follow and be up to date without having to go through hundreds of post.

Thanks again,
Felix