Hi PaQ,

> and ... what about right click on the style name from the here ?

Hmmm, yup that would be another good candidate for some kind of shortcut.

I guess it could either pop up the "Edit styles" dialog (the one with the list of all styles on it with Add/Delete/Edit/Up/Down), or the "Edit style" dialog for editing the properties (currently name and color) of just that one style.

Any idea which one would make more sense?


> > But Ctrl+Click on a swatch is not currently used for anything,
> > so that could be a possibility.

> Well, I don't like to much mutli key combo like that, it
> probably not really in the MoI spirit :)

I don't really want to rely on them for the basic essential functions, but they can be good for shortcuts and advanced type functions.

The only problem is that I just remembered that I was going to also use that Ctrl+click as a way to set the style on the parent brep object without changing any sub-objects... I guess I could do something like shift for that instead though.


re: specular - I think I may go for even slightly less brightness than that for the initial default setting, so there is just a hint of it.


> I've rerender the robot too with that settings ->
> http://users.skynet.be/fc508872/WIP.html

Wow, your robot is looking really awesome there with the new lighting and shading system!

It does look a lot like a rendering instead of a real time display which is pretty cool! :) I guess kind of more like a semi-toon or technical illustration type rendering though since there are no shadows. But possibly when I do get a chance to do some basic built in renderer work it may be more focused on that kind of a style initially rather than a photoreal type orientation.

- Michael

Hello Michael,

>> Any idea which one would make more sense?

I would prefer to 'edit the color/name' dialog from the actual style and not having the complete list.

>> specular - I think I may go for even slightly less brightness than that for the initial default setting, so there is just a hint of it.

Probably, I like the hdri kind of reflection it actually gives :) really good work.

>> But possibly when I do get a chance to do some basic built in renderer work it may be more focused on that kind of a style initially rather than a photoreal type orientation.

Yes, because if you start a photrealistic engine, and if it turns too good, I'll crying to import my poly models in MoI :P

>> I would prefer to 'edit the color/name' dialog from the actual style and not having the complete list.

Me too :-)

"It does look a lot like a rendering instead of a real time display which is pretty cool! :) I guess kind of more like a semi-toon or technical illustration type rendering though since there are no shadows."

I like that lighting a lot. Has a nice illustration quality that I can't get with my render application.

Let's capture those settings and call it "Illustrate" !

Ed

Sorry I am come back and so many post to read !

But just a silly question :)
Is it possible to save (or copy an object) for apply the same lights and colors?
Said the regulates of the PaQ flying object "render" apply to another thing?
Or we must make all the same regulates by hand?

Hi Pilou,

The lighting is not saved in the model, but in the MoI config file ... it's not linked to the geometry.
And we can't actually share config fragment, so you probably have to do it by hand.

@PaQ: thx for the precisions!

You could make a template then import your geometry.

PaQ - I've been looking at your work and you've got some pretty awesome stuff! Nice! :)