Unrelated math help
All  1-15  16-20

Previous
Next
 From:  BurrMan
11259.16 In reply to 11259.15 
Thanks Anthony!
I’ll take a look at the spreadsheet later. I’ll also post back to you if i discover the culprit in my workflow.

Hopefully it is legit and not something like a lack of attention
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Anthony (PROP_DESIGN)
11259.17 In reply to 11259.16 
hi burrman,

i've updated the spreadsheet several times. this most recent update, i should mention something. brian's earlier post was comparing 2.2oz vs 2.0oz. that leads to a 10% diff in density or volume. Later, you compared 7.2oz to 7.02oz. that leads to a 2.56% diff in density or volume. the math is the same, it's just what two numbers are being compared. I added this into the spreadsheet. in reality; mass, density, and volume are all unknown to some degree. so you end up going in circles. you have to at least lie to yourself a little and say you know two things, in order to 'measure' the third thing. you can't not know all three things. there is only one equation so you can only have one unknown.

i think someone mentioned this, but you said your measurements are in ounces. so technically you are measuring mass, if the units are right. however, a lot of scales are measuring weight and reporting mass. so it gets confusing. also people say weight when they should say mass and vice versa. i used the word weight in the spreadsheet to match what you were saying. but the units are in mass, which is what you were also saying. i think i know what you mean. it's just weird. i also switched to inputting grams because the scales seem to work better in metric. all labs use metric as well. you can change the spreadsheet as you see fit though.
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  bemfarmer
11259.18 
I've pretty much dropped out of this discussion, but did look up some lead alloy information, links attached:

Fishing lure, and tire lead talk: (alloys less dense than pure lead, usually)
https://www.tidalfish.com/threads/lead-for-pouring-jigs.279917/

Monotype lead, also links to Linotype lead, (whatever those terms mean):
https://www.matweb.com/search/datasheet.aspx?matguid=63031aa385cc4b72b103fa2dc9320ca8&ckck=1

- Brian
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  BurrMan
11259.19 
Thanks for everything. Working on it now
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
 From:  bemfarmer
11259.20 
While researching anodizing, came across the fact that bismuth is also used for fishing sinkers.
http://www.observationsblog.com/sciencetechnologyexperiments/anodizing-and-dying-aluminum-without-battery-acid

There are also Bismuth 58%, Tin 42% alloys, (and other alloys). Melts at 520 degrees Fahrenheit +/_. Density 75% of lead.
Bismuth, 80% of leads density.
Bismuth is brittle.
Bismuth expands 3.3% when solidifying.

Lead melts at 621.5 degrees F.
Tungsten density is 19.25 grams per cubic centimeter, versus Lead at 11.33 g/cc. Melting point, 6,191.6°F, so not relevant.

- Brian

EDITED: 27 Nov 2023 by BEMFARMER

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged
 

Reply to All Reply to All

 

 
 
Show messages: All  1-15  16-20