Hi c3g,

re:
> can you do a tutorial or recommended tutorial on expanding the surface or sub-d method

There is a good introduction video to how sub-d works here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckOTl2GcS-E

- Michael

Hi Michael.
Any news on the release date of V5?

Hi cyanayc,

re:
> Any news on the release date of V5?

Maybe right near the end of the year, not 100% sure though.

- Michael

Hi Michael,

Is there a chance to update 3dm importer in Moi ?
I'm getting more and more *.3dm v7 file formats from Rhino and i can't open them in Moi which is still stuck at v5 of 3dm file format :(.

Thanks

Hi Lewis, I'm sorry but it will be pretty difficult to update to a new .3dm importer with every new release of Rhino.

Currently it's not planned. But I have made a free conversion utility that can convert Rhino v6 or v7 .3dm files into a v5 .3dm file that can then be opened with MoI.

It's available here:
http://moi3d.com/resources#Rhino6/7_3DM_file_format_to_Rhino5_3DM_file_format_(MOI3D_compatible)_converter

- Michael

Hi Michael,

Thanks for quick reply.
I just tried this converter and I have 2 problems with it.

1. it just dumps _v5 file, no save as or progress bar (weird but ok i can live with that).
2. It's not loaded completely (I'm trying to convert chair 3d model and i got only frame but soft cushioning is not visible in Moi after conversion). So basically moi is not opening it correctly after conversion or conversion is bad.

I can send you model if you wish to test ?

Hi Lewis,

re:
> 1. it just dumps _v5 file, no save as or progress bar (weird but ok i can live with that).

Right, that's because it takes a lot of work to make functionality like progress bars, this is just a bare bones utility program that isn't focused on having any UI.


> 2. It's not loaded completely (I'm trying to convert chair 3d model and i got only frame
> but soft cushioning is not visible in Moi after conversion). So basically moi is not opening
> it correctly after conversion or conversion is bad.

Most likely the soft cushioning is some kind of object type that MoI does not support like a polygon mesh object.

Moi only reads NURBS and annotation type objects from .3dm files, not every kind of thing that Rhino can store in them.


> I can send you model if you wish to test ?

Sure you can e-mail it to me at moi@moi3d.com, you may need to use a file sharing service if it's very large.

But it's very likely that it's polygon mesh data that MoI is not designed to work on.

- Michael

Hi Michael,i have question about adding new ACIS core,it will be help to fastly delete fillets without losing the original shape before fillet?

And if there is such a function, when will it be released? at the very end when the ACIS "press pull" function will be added?

Hi blackboard,

re:
> Hi Michael,i have question about adding new ACIS core,it will be help to fastly delete fillets
> without losing the original shape before fillet?

I think so but I have not had a chance to evaluate that particular area yet.

Some ACIS functions are separated out into optional modules which I am not licensing.


> And if there is such a function, when will it be released? at the very end when the
> ACIS "press pull" function will be added?

I don't know exactly when that area will be released, but possibly not until MoI v6, the main target functions for using ACIS in the MoI v5 timeframe are fillet, chamfer, shelling, offset and face transforms.

- Michael

Hi Micheal, this functionality shown in the video below is also included in the license package you have for ACIS for Moi3D?

Hi pafurijaz,

re:
> Hi Micheal, this functionality shown in the video below is also included in the license package you have for ACIS for Moi3D?

Nope.

- Michael

Hi Micheal, when version 5 will be released, which 3dm version of Rhinoceros also be able to open?

Hi pafurijaz,

re:
> Hi Micheal, when version 5 will be released,

Sorry, I don't know yet.


> which 3dm version of Rhinoceros also be able to open?

It will open v5 .3dm files.

- Michael

Hi Michael,

Just wanted to write a little reminder if you would be so kind to please add the Centroid Triangulation option as a checkbox to MoI's export dialog, instead of having it hidden away in the MoI.ini file.

Here's the discussion about the subject:

https://moi3d.com/forum/messages.php?webtag=MOI&msg=8109.1

Many thanks!

Hi Metin, one reason I have not done that yet is that I'm trying pretty hard to prevent the UI in MoI from getting bloated and complex as naturally tends to occur.

So I often hesitate and tend to be pretty conservative about accumulating too much stuff in the UI.

One thing that could help is if I could remove any control for meshing which is not really being used, perhaps "Aspect ratio limit" ?

Thanks, - Michael

Hi Michael,

I understand.

In my humble opinion, Centroid Triangulation is a significant option for meshing, particularly in case of higher polygon counts. It often allows meshes to be ready for sculpting and/or deformation in Blender, ZBrush or 3D-Coat without further retopology.

I almost never use Aspect Ratio Limit, so I'd be fine with seeing that removed and having the Centroid Triangulation option instead.

I do always use all other options in the export dialog, except for Aspect Ratio Limit.

Thanks!

Hi Michael,

Re: Deform to Sphere, Deleted Posts 11310.10 and 11311.11.

Original Question...

I'm trying to understand why in beta Version 5b...when you click Done after Deform-Flow, the Flow process just starts calculating again. In Version 4 the command stops immediately. That is confusing to me. I'm experimenting with your Bell Flat_flow.3dm file.

Is that a bug or is that just the way it works?

Wm

Hi Wm,

re:
> I'm trying to understand why in beta Version 5b...when you click Done after Deform-Flow,
> the Flow process just starts calculating again. In Version 4 the command stops immediately.
> That is confusing to me. I'm experimenting with your Bell Flat_flow.3dm file.

The different behavior from v4 looks like is caused by the introduction of Groups in v5, there is some processing that happens to support groups which as a side effect triggers a final update even if there was a previous update.


> Is that a bug or is that just the way it works?

I guess it's a bug since the final update for processing groups shouldn't need to be done if there are not any groups being transformed.

It's not a particularly harmful bug though, it may run the risk of messing up group handling to fiddle with it.

Support for groups involved some pretty big changes throughout the system.

- Michael

Michael,

Thank you for the explanation. I was just curious and didn't want this to go unnoticed

Regards,
Wm

Hi,i think i found bug,if i fillet acis tube,he do wrong shanding