How to make this solid?
 1-17  18-22

Previous
Next
 From:  Koi
10782.18 
Hey Brian and Michael,
I thank you so much! I love to learn how MoI and Nurbs are going!
I got your points.
I tried to make it solid with network aswell, but this was not possible, because I did not take a second profile on the sides to prevent overlapping?
Thanks so much, thid forum makes it defintely bigger!

thanks a lot,
Koi
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Koi
10782.19 
Hey guys,
it´s me again with a new question :)
I build a beautiful objetct with the sweep tool. And made this solid.
On the object is like a small seam to see, i made a screenshot aswell. Is it possible to get a nearly same result without that?

Best regards,

Koi

P.S. I am still working with V4 and, as you can see, not a real pro. Do you think I should switch on v5?
Attachments:

Image Attachments:
Size: 232.2 KB, Downloaded: 20 times, Dimensions: 876x619px
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
10782.20 In reply to 10782.19 
Hi Koi, the problem is basically trying to do too much all in one single surfacing operation. If you try to force a sweep to go through too many shape changes it can result in a stressed surface that can have warping in the surface as it sort of tries to simultaneously pivot and stay squished together.

One method that might be good would be to use a one rail sweep like this: (with Twist = Flat option set)



That's going to make a more relaxed surface and then the top can be formed by a separate surface with a fillet or blend to transition between them:




Compare the surface control points between this sweep and your previous one, note how there is a lot heavier points and some strained areas where things are kind of bunching up. When you get the kind of "seam" like you were seeing it's sort of like too many forces applying stretching, shearing and rotation all at once in a small area and making little bumps.





- Michael

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
Next
 From:  Michael Gibson
10782.21 In reply to 10782.19 
Hi Koi, so then to put on the top as a separate piece you do something like this - I made a taller version of the one rail sweep to have more material to work with, it looks a bit weird at top initially but it's ok that doesn't have any actual bunching or self intersections and it will be getting sliced off:



Set up a cross section and rail for the top cap something like this:



Sweep to make the top cap base surface, note that you want this to be a simple extended 4 sided surface so it can be a relaxed surface that you will trim instead of trying to force the initial surface shape directly to the ending boundary edge:



Offset cap surface since you're making a thin wall shape:



Trim surfaces with each other and join:



Apply a G2 fillet:



- Michael

  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged

Previous
 From:  Michael Gibson
10782.22 In reply to 10782.19 
Basically on your version trying to keep the top clamped together while also having the bottom rotate is just too many different shaping forces all trying to be applied at the same time.

2 rail sweep between rails of different lengths can also just generally apply a type of shearing type of effect as it is sliding things along the rails at different speeds and things can be prone to getting bunched up if they are also trying to do other kinds of shape transition at the same time.

- Michael
  Reply Reply More Options
Post Options
Reply as PM Reply as PM
Print Print
Mark as unread Mark as unread
Relationship Relationship
IP Logged
 

Reply to All Reply to All

 

 
 
Show messages:  1-17  18-22