Show messages: All
1-2
3-8
From: miquik
Hi Michael,
Yes, that would be great! Indeed, for my needs, It would be enough to add a "static" prefix for example, but if you think it would be easy to let user choose prefix/suffix, it would be better.
So, I'm waiting for that, it will help me a lot
Thanks
From: Michael Gibson
Hi miquik, yes I think that should be easy to allow a user specified prefix/suffix. And it preserves current behavior if they are just left blank.
I should be able to add it for the next v4 beta.
Thanks, - Michael
From: Michael Gibson
Hi miquik, maybe it's a little cleaner to do it like this, that is more compact so it would be easier to fit it in the PDF/AI export options as well:
- Michael
Image Attachments:
screenshot_2019-07-03_02-38-54.png
From: miquik
You are the boss! so it's up to you!
From: miquik
Sorry Michael,
Just another consideration. We talking about export to dxf by "style" but what about export by "name"?
My STEP files are composed of several "bodies"; my step exporter set a name to each of them and MOI import them setting name property (but keeping everything as "Default Style").
I write a little script to create a style of every name in object tree; after that I can export in dxf with all stuff we discussed yesterday.
I would like to avoid this, why dxf exporter could not simply use "object name" as layer in export procedure?
Miquik
From: Michael Gibson
Hi Miquik,
re:
> I would like to avoid this, why dxf exporter could not simply use "object name" as layer in export procedure?
Layers in DXF match more closely to Styles in MoI than they do to object names. Layers in DXF have a name and a color associated with them. Styles in MoI also have a name and color associated with them while object names have only a name and no color.
So that's why MoI's DXF exporter is focused on transferring styles as a layers in the DXF output.
- Michael
Show messages: All
1-2
3-8
