Show messages:
1-2
3-22
23-31
From: pafurijaz
Nice for fbx, about obj the file format doesn't store creases but what I mean is the use of edge sharp as a trick because OBJ store in it the normal information for the smoothness shading like this image below, is something assimilable for the creases information inside that anyway Moi3D doesn't use in importing process. As can see in the images below these edges on the model are marked only because they are marked in the obj file format.
Anyway that aren't the right way,is only a compromise.
Anyway I'm happy with new feature in Moi3D I have the ability to convert complex hull without much works already with the v4 Thanks!
Image Attachments:
Schermata del 2021-03-03 11-32-06.png
Schermata del 2021-03-03 11-32-29.png
From: Michael Gibson
HI Tom, ok but you are aware that MoI is a NURBS modeler, right? So that's what it is primarily focused on.
If you're not interested in NURBS modeling then I find it confusing why you are here.
Sub-D is definitely useful and has its place particularly for organic shapes but for example the shape you
posted earlier is very easily constructed using NURBS modeling:
The strong area of NURBS is with models that are well defined using 2D profile curves.With mechanical shapes
it's sub-d that becomes a horrible kludge, instead of just being able to drill a hole through something you have
to manage a sea of points and become an expert in topology. And even if you fight your way through all that at
the end you don't have any kind of precision control over how exact of a circle you've got. With NURBS you just
do this:
Sub-d has a significantly higher learning curve, it requires developing spatial awareness skills that are
more like sculpting and wrangling points in 3D space. Forming shapes from 2D profile curves in NURBS
modeling is significantly easier for people to learn when starting from scratch. That's the reason why MoI exists.
re:
> Maybe one day MoI will do the same as Rhino does now, implement SubD as a native object format.
Yes, that is something I'm slowly working towards. That's the reason why I added a SubD to NURBS converter
in for MoI v4, to open the door for a using a hybrid modeling approach using SubD to create some organic
elements like say the base form of a helmet and then continue working on it using the regular NURBS toolset
to construct other components from curves and add details using booleans.
The Sub-d converter is a step towards that, in the future I do expect to add some sub-d modeling tools directly
into MoI as well, at a kind of basic level for doing fairly lightweight base shapes.
- Michael
Image Attachments:
tom_nurbs1.jpg
tom_nurbs2.jpg
tom_nurbs3.jpg
tom_nurbs4.jpg
From: Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
<<< like in Blender a weight per edge between 0.0 and 1.0 for in-between semi-sharpness).
Seems this "weight" is something in Nurbs variable fillets...
From: Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
What was the method used for the start volume ?
From: Michael Gibson
Hi Pilou, I did an extrude followed by boolean intersection:
- Michael
Image Attachments:
pilou_shape1.jpg
pilou_shape2.jpg
pilou_shape3.jpg
From: Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
Funny as the position of the vertical section changes the result!
From: ed (EDDYF)
Michael wrote: "... open the door for a using a hybrid modeling approach using SubD to create some organic
elements like say the base form of a helmet and then continue working on it using the regular NURBS toolset
to construct other components from curves and add details using booleans."
Exactly. I'm working on my 3rd MoI car model tutorial at the moment. Built 100% within MoI. The car body is SubD, the interior is partial Sub D & partial Nurbs, and the wire spoke wheels and external chrome trim pieces & bumpers are Nurbs.
I like working within one program, and a hybrid approach works well for those times you need it. After seeing demos of the latest Rhino SubD tools, I considered buying Rhino for that purpose. Then I realized I don't need SubD for my business use, just my hobby use, so I decided against buying. So while the current SubD tool set is limited, you can do some very useful work.
My opinion is MoI has most the essential SubD tools and just a few more basic ones would make a very nice toolkit. As with any software, you'll want the high end complex packages if you're a professional, but MoI gets the job done for me.
Ed Ferguson
From: pafurijaz
Also for me Moi3D is sufficiently good if you know how use, the SubD, Moi3D gave me now the possibility to make complex hulls, that I can edit and make these better inside Moi3d in less time, but I have an experience in both type of software Nurbs CAD and mesh modelling such as sub-div software, I can also predict dimensions of surfaces also diameters and for me is a dream this bridge between these worlds not only for organics types, because often is very harder obtaining a Nurbs shapes with surface continuity in a CAD modeler.
these images are all converted from subdiv geometry, edited inside Moi3D in various mode with boolean and surfaces joined and made them solid.
Image Attachments:
Schermata del 2021-03-04 01-44-01.png
Schermata del 2021-03-04 01-45-01.png
tn.png
From: John (OKEN)
Hi pafurijaz,
I do agree at 200% but i'm really comfortable with my new workflow since 2 years now : Moi3D + Blender
Cheers
Show messages:
1-2
3-22
23-31
