Full Version: V4 beta Oct-17-2018 available now - SubD to NURBS conversion

Show messages:  1  …  42-61  62-81  82-101  102-121  122-141  142-161  162-181  …  262-264

Thread Split: Some posts in this thread have been moved here

Hi Michael,

well, i have no answer for this, but only see that it works with Wings3D...

Regards
Stefan

---

Hi Michael ...
That must be the problem ... the pdf image starts to fuzz out at about 800% zoom. The pdf file was created by a scan. Could it have been saved as a vector file at that time? How?
In any event converting it to a jpg file worked well enough.
thanks,
eric

---

Hi eric, usually a scan only generates bitmap image data and not things like line segment vector data.

There are some kinds of converter programs though that can convert it though. Another name for bitmap data is "raster data" and these kinds of converter programs are often referred to as Raster to Vector converters:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_raster-to-vector_conversion_software
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_tracing

- Michael

---

Here is a sample fbx with some edge weighting. FBX version is 2018.

Attachments:
EdgeWeight.fbx

Image Attachments:
EdgeWeight.JPG 

---

Is it how the wing3D model is supposed to look ?

That's a little trick I use sometimes to transfer edge weight with obj, by relying on vertex normal to define where the crease are supposed to be.
The idea is to split the vertex into points based on vertex normal attribute, create a group with the open edges, and on this edge selection I create the crease attribute the subdivision method is looking for, re-weld every points and apply the subdivision operation.

So yes it's a way to save crease in .obj, but I don't if this method is really reliable.

Image Attachments:
VertexSplit.jpg 

---

Hi PaQ,

yes, that is the model. However the creases (when using the "Hardness" command in Wings3D)
are 100 percent sharp. One can use also another option to soften them.


image hosting

Regards
Stefan

---

Hi, I explained myself badly, what I mean is better understood with a reference image that I enclose below and with some sample files.



As you can see the USB plug is exported with Moi3D in Obj and in the export Moi3D, mark the faces edges with sharp attribute, but as regards the conversion to SubD it is an unused attribute and could be used as an expedient case before finding a valid alternative.



And here some shading difference inside the awesome app CAD Assistant for phone that manage several type and conversion and many more features. Here the shading with edge sharp is better to understand the shapes.

https://www.opencascade.com/content/cad-assistant

And I attach the file in obj with marked sharp and no mark..

Attachments:
Obj_files.zip

Image Attachments:
image4675.png 

---

Hi pafurijaz, looking at the differences between your 2 .obj files it looks like the "sharp marked" one has different vertex normals. Vertex normals are meant to be used for shading polygons in display or rendering, not for subdivision smoothing control. Does Blender itself behave any differently between those .obj models if you import them back in and apply subd smoothing there?

- Michael

---

Yes, in fact it is as you said these are the normal info, used for smooth and sharp faces, No Blender only imports the attribute for shading that uses smooth and sharp shading. So could you use at this point the normal information being converted into Nurbs? Many 3D applications manage border information for normals.

---

Silouewette DFX export to modo.

AI export.

Image Attachments:
TC_DXF_2modo.png 

---

Hi pafurijaz,

re:
> So could you use at this point the normal information being converted into Nurbs?

No, not to get the same surface result that you would see by applying subdivision smoothing in a polygon modeling program.

That information is only used in programs currently for shading, not for controlling geometry shaping. Trying to use it for shaping would make the sub-d surface result in MoI look different than it does in all other programs which would be kind of weird. It's a goal to make the result in MoI behave the same as applying sub-d smoothing in other programs.

- Michael

---

Hi Chris,

just loaded your MODO .fbx into Silo and ZBrush. In Silo the creases come not through,
but in ZBrush it works!

Regards
Stefan

---

@Michael Gibson
as promised I did the test of MoI under WINE with Nvidia GPUs. And it seems to confirm my findings - with proprietary drivers you get this delayed refresh / state issue.
I've tested it on 3 different workstations (dual Xeon with gtx 980 and gtx 1060, dual Xeon with gtx 1050ti and 1030, i7 with gtx 570) and with 2 different distros (OpenSUSE Leap 15 and Fedora 28). Each time I've installed proprietary driver the issue showed up (no matter distro repo or package from Nvidia site has been used).
With nouveau or when AMD card had been used (got a hold of rx 560 for tests) everything worked normally, no matter Wayland or X11 was running (side note - and damn, it was a joy to use MoI under Linux).

Interesting obesrvation has been made on the first Xeon PC - when I plugged in AMD card AFTER Nvidia drivers were installed first, the issue showed on it as well. Sadly I haven't tested whether it will remain if I remove 2nd Nvidia GPU (to make things clear - even though 2nd Nvidia card was still present it was AMD RX 560 that has been used for display purposes). Something I'll try to check next time.

I really don't know what to make out of this, but maybe someone will :) . At this point my biggest hopes are still for MoI V4 and DXVK (not high hopes though). Can't wait for the release so I could test the demo.

---

Hi Przemas, thanks very much for testing it!

I'm not sure right now what I can do about it... Is Nouveau not good enough to use instead of the proprietary driver?

Thanks, - Michael

---

Message 9100.116 was deleted

---

@Michael - will try posting on Nvidia boards. Maybe someone will figure it out.
Nouveau is sadly not an option - I use a bunch of 3d apps where it would be a showstopper (Modo for example). In general because of Nvidia policy and trying to keep everything under their control open source drivers support for their cards is lacking (you simply have to use their proprietary driver if you need good 3d performance).
One of the reasons I won't get Nvidia card for the workstation that needs a replacement. But the one in my pc is too new for a swap. Maybe if I do a bit of juggling between PCs and keep Nvidia GPU only for a vm with pcie passthrough...
Anyways ... hope to get MoI running correctly on my Linux workstation - and I intend to keep on trying ;) .

---

Congrats Michael, this SubDs to NURBS is amazing addition to already great app like MOI.
Thanks.

---

Just to add my test, too :) Have to admit, this is just what I wanted, ability to convert to nurbs at some point, do trims and blends and export back
to polygonal modeling app. Through years, learned to avoid all edge weighting except full sharpness, where result is same as disconnecting. This was only way to have a predictable results anywhere.

Image Attachments:
moi_subd.jpg 

---

Here something very interesting, made with blender cloth simulator and SubD into NUBRS, very clean result only edges on boundary of surfaces.

Image Attachments:
Cloth_f40.png 

---

The sds mesh to nurbs conversion is a great idea, indeed! Thanks to Micheal for adding such a useful feature to Moi!

Btw, Anto... what tools did you use for producing such a mesh object? Mesh fusion, Hard mesh? Or the new add-on of Blender 'Bevel after boolean'?

---

Show messages:  1  …  42-61  62-81  82-101  102-121  122-141  142-161  162-181  …  262-264