MoI discussion forum
MoI discussion forum

Full Version: Top 5 Features list for V3 !

Show messages:  1-19  …  120-139  140-159  160-179  180-199  200-219  220-239  240-259  …  440-442

From: southpaw (SOUTHPAWAMI)
3 Aug 2011   [#180] In reply to [#179]
Michael,

Thank you. You answered a lot of questions. I was sure I could use MoI, it just was starting to look like I need to use other things too.

Voxel manufacturing... that makes sense. Less than millimeter accuracy probably isn't a sculpting priority. I don't suppose perfect geometry is either. conversion to STL... cool, thank you.

Student license... thank you so much on that... it's as nice as rhino's student license. You programmed Rhino too, I thought.

So now I have a question. What is houdini doing(or how?) when I take a sphere, sub-divide it 3 or 4 or 5 times and then just carve right into it. I mean really, it's like a piece of wood or something. Is this sculpting? I really haven't seen any other non-voxel program do anything like this kind of thing without any slow down like houdini does... so it seems rather magical to me. Is houdini converting it to something else to play with it, or what?
From: BurrMan
3 Aug 2011   [#181] In reply to [#180]
Hi Southpaw....
Here is a link that shows some results of a model i made in MoI and sent to shapeways 3d printing, and the result I recieved...

http://moi3d.com/forum/index.php?webtag=MOI&msg=2984.9

The only difference is now they have a $25.00 "minimum", so gone are the days of getting my model for only 9 dollars..
From: southpaw (SOUTHPAWAMI)
3 Aug 2011   [#182] In reply to [#181]
That is really neat. It seems so foreign to simply give a 3d model and get a result for so little money. I could see how MoI was perfect for making that model too.
From: BurrMan
3 Aug 2011   [#183] In reply to [#182]
Yes. it is very handy if you are going to manufacture somthing in very expensive material to be able to test it out first for $25.00! Actually, very cool for making little "Figures" too!
From: Mike K4ICY (MAJIKMIKE)
3 Aug 2011   [#184] In reply to [#181]
Holy cats Burr! That's really awesome.
From: Michael Gibson
3 Aug 2011   [#185] In reply to [#180]
Hi southpaw,

> I was sure I could use MoI, it just was starting to look
> like I need to use other things too.

Yeah, if you want to build models that are not very well defined by profile curves (like human figures for instance), then you probably do want to use a poly/sub-d type modeler for those particular models.


> So now I have a question. What is houdini doing(or how?)
> when I take a sphere, sub-divide it 3 or 4 or 5 times and
> then just carve right into it.

I'm not really familiar with the carving function in houdini - do you have any screenshots of that?

It kind of sounds like you may be painting a displacement map on it though - that's a type of texture that can be applied to an object to make the surface push up or down.

You should be able to see a similar thing in ZBrush or 3D-Coat. ZBrush actually works by displacing polygons, and 3D-coat has multiple modes in it - it has a poly displacement mode and a voxel mode as well.

- Michael
From: _SpiderweB_ (3DIDEA)
4 Aug 2011   [#186] In reply to [#181]
Hi BurrMan are you a fisherman like me??
very nice work
From: BurrMan
4 Aug 2011   [#187] In reply to [#186]
Hey spiderweb,
No, my brothers fish... I never had the patience for it..



But you did recognize a reel drag there... He makes custom components for reels, among other things... He also made the part.. I just modeled it with him.

http://www.rocketreels.com/videos/casting_v_1.wmv
From: Lemo (LEMONNADO)
9 Aug 2011   [#188]
A offset curve command which does not yield a million overlapping line segments would be great 8)
Rainer
From: Mike K4ICY (MAJIKMIKE)
9 Aug 2011   [#189] In reply to [#188]
> A offset curve command which does not yield a million overlapping line segments would be great

Could that situation be fixed with the Rebuild command?

Perhaps a new addition to the Offset command would be an option to "interpolate" the result curve.
From: Michael Gibson
9 Aug 2011   [#190] In reply to [#188]
Hi Rainer -

> A offset curve command which does not yield a million
> overlapping line segments would be great 8)

If you've got an example that you've got a problem with, could you please send me the file at moi@moi3d.com or post it here?

Do you possibly have a messy starting curve that already starts out with a million little overlapping bits in it to begin with?

If you want to reduce control point density, then the Rebuild command can work well for that - that's different than having overlapping line segments though.


(EDIT: oops at first I thought this was on Mike's thread and I wrote about starting a new thread but forget that)

- Michael
From: Mike K4ICY (MAJIKMIKE)
9 Aug 2011   [#191]
Michael,

I love that the lines and curves in MoI are anti-aliased. They give a smooth appearance and really do justice to the smooth nature of Bezier type splines.

As a plus, even the corners are perceptively pointy and purely triangular.


However, I noticed that the edges of surfaces and edges (especially with the curves and edges turned off from view) are not anti-aliased. Just left jagged.

I can gather that providing this treatment to the video card rendering would slow it down severely, IF the model was in motion.

But could there be a way to provide this feature when not changing the view-port. Or in other words, a second after movement has stopped,

an anti-aliased version could be updated. On top of that, this complete anti-aliasing of all edges, surfaces and curves could be done only during idle time,

during the instant that there are no calculations, or mouse movement. Being an optional flag in the setup dialog of course.

Moving the view functions, such as panning, dolly and so forth would be done without anti-aliasing as in the past.

But as soon as you stop and look at your work: Man, would it look just that much better.


Maybe this is card dependent or not even possible?... It's just a nifty thought for suggestion.

Thanks, Mike

Image Attachments:
alias.jpg 


From: Michael Gibson
9 Aug 2011   [#192] In reply to [#191]
Hi Mike, yup that is certainly possible to have anti-aliasing on surfaces only, unless you have a lower memory (like less than 256MB say) video card.

That's something that I haven't focused on very much yet because under normal operation you've got the edges being drawn on top of most of those areas which obscures that stuff. Also there is a speed hit involved with doing the surface antialiasing, although this is minimal on modern cards.

But anyway since there are some potential performance consequences of turning it on, it's not something that I can just blindly switch on - it needs some testing with a variety of machines to make sure that it does not get turned on for the more basic and low memory video card situations and cripple those basic cards. Maybe it's something that you'll have to switch on yourself manually in options rather than on by default.

Anyway, it's mostly because under regular operation the edges cover up many of those areas that it has just not been a priority so far at all.

- Michael
From: Mike K4ICY (MAJIKMIKE)
9 Aug 2011   [#193] In reply to [#192]
Thanks for the insight Michael, if there ever was the option, it would have to be 'off' by default for those reasons.
From: kevjon
21 Aug 2011   [#194]
These are things I would like most to see in MoI and think they would benefit most people using the software

- Surface continuity tools.
- Rebuild surface tool to clean up your surfaces where there a lots of bunched points which happens with many commands like network and 2 rail sweep.
- Ability to sculpt surfaces like Tsplines. (I know, I know you should be using a sub'd modeller for this but far easier if you could do the whole model in nurbs rather than parts of it. Its also far easier to do further work with booleans on nurbs surfaces rather the poly meshes).
- variable radius filleting.
- Patch surface tool for filling holes and where surface continuity is req'd

Some other notes
- Join tool is too model size dependent. Most of the time it doesn't work for me without scaling the model down in size all the time so it would be nice to get further work done on this tool.
From: ed17 (ED17ES)
22 Aug 2011   [#195]
Rebuild does exist and there is a reconstruct command too.
From: BurrMan
22 Aug 2011   [#196] In reply to [#195]
Hi Ed...There is a rebuild.. But not for "surfaces".....
From: ed17 (ED17ES)
22 Aug 2011   [#197]
My mistake!
From: FelixPQ (FELIX)
23 Aug 2011   [#198]
Hi all.

here is something I would like to see in V3. In the file I supply, you can see on the default style we have 4 surfaces, on union we have the union command applied, on join we have the join command applied and both give us a solid. But I would like the option to create a solid more like the Final result style shows, where there is a pretty nice and clean solid with no multisegment edge and basically no undesired edge and of course no seams.

May be it could be a kind of solid rebuild kind of command. This is the way I think Michael would implement such a thing.

Regards,
Felix

Attachments:
Union2.3dm


From: eric (ERICCLOUGH)
23 Aug 2011   [#199] In reply to [#198]
I am still hoping for some basic 2d text and dimensions ... so that 2d drawings in MoI can noted without using another program.
cheers,
eric

Show messages:  1-19  …  120-139  140-159  160-179  180-199  200-219  220-239  240-259  …  440-442