MoI discussion forum
MoI discussion forum

Full Version: V5 Wish List

Show messages:  1-12  13-32  33-52  53-72  73-92  93-112  113-132  133-152  …  633-639

From: Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
11 Feb 2021   [#73] In reply to [#72]
What version ? I see 200 to 700 $
https://www.punchcad.com/punch-v12-1-update-offer
From: Mindset (IGNITER)
27 Feb 2021   [#74]
Hello Michael,

Thank you for all that you do.
This is just a respectful reminder from message 10194.12.

Some method whereby one might set a formula to manipulate the Dimensions' Numeric Value.

Your wonderful software and support are legendary.
MindSet
From: BurrMan
27 Feb 2021   [#75] In reply to [#73]
Hey Frenchy,
""""""""""""What version ? """""""""""""""""""

Yup. $200. Hadn't looked in awhile and I'm on version 10. So back in version 10 you could get it for $99 when they were in ownership transition...

But $200 is still insanely cheap for the acis kernel and It's fillet ability.

So the difference would be, shapemanager is offering that realtime push pull of the fillet. A huge time saver if you are just randomly pushing fillets around all day to look at various result.

The viacad engine still needs a value entered, and will throw various errors when it hits limits, that you have to back out of, where the shapemanager just "stops", or presents a non destructive error) etc... (At least in Version 10. I don't have or haven't looked at the newer version since then)

But you still have to learn the shapemanager filleter too... It doesn't come without limitations.

BTW: The best filleter I have found over time is Spaceclaim. It's also the ACIS Kernel......
From: Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
27 Feb 2021   [#76] In reply to [#75]
I have the free 123D and the Space Claim light DesignSparks Mechanical who have i believe the same kernel! ;)
From: Cuboctahedron
28 Feb 2021   [#77]
I'd love to be able to have persistent construction lines that act like a subclass of regular lines. Yes, I can just have a specific style for construction lines, but this would be more convenient. Bonus points if construction lines are tied to the objects they reference and move with them. One could even posit preventing options that make the construction line's relation no longer true, allowing for at least some types of modeling constraints.
From: BurrMan
28 Feb 2021   [#78] In reply to [#76]
Notice the limit....

Image Attachments:
limit.jpg 


From: Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
28 Feb 2021   [#79] In reply to [#78]
Seems normal that a limit was existing somewhere...


From: BurrMan
28 Feb 2021   [#80] In reply to [#79]
So MoI will do that same fillet, and hit the same limit.

MoI though, hits a limit that the other image has success with. When the outer edge of the square is incorporated in there, then the 2 separate fillets hitting each other also limit, where the shapemanager fillet will eat each other to a point...
From: Zooen
23 Mar 2021   [#81]
Hi, In some software it is possible to configure shortcuts with two letters. I have always found it very practical to discriminate between the different functions and this considerably increases the possibilities: 26² = 676 possibilities!?.
In addition, it allows to create mnemonic shortcuts, R - Rotate and RA - RotateAxis, op - Open, of - Offset, etc.

Of course this is not a priority.

Have a nice day
- Zooen
From: Frenchy Pilou (PILOU)
24 Mar 2021   [#82] In reply to [#81]
You have yet the solution to make a little text file list with any function
then Copy Past the function that you want after the Press TAB! ;)

Rustic but efficient :)
And no problem of memory headache :)
From: mdesign
24 Mar 2021   [#83]
I would like to ask about adding short notes to objects. I do some operations over object and I don`t remember values which I`ve put there. When I`m doing corrections I always wonder what values should I put because I don`t remember what I`ve put there last time. So I write on paper some number. I wonder if it would be possible to add short notes feature which would be attached to object name.

I would like also ask about adding folders to object names and maybe coloring those folders on bigger files.

What do you think about it?

Cheers!!!
From: Michael Gibson
24 Mar 2021   [#84] In reply to [#83]
Hi mdesign, could you please describe a bit more about what you mean by "coloring those folders on bigger files" ?

- Michael
From: mdesign
24 Mar 2021   [#85] In reply to [#84]
Sure. I am mainly SubD modeler but lately I do more and more cad works. When I work layer colors are important in my workflow because after many hours of working I`m not seeing very well.
So I colorize things. Red color is means for me it`s latest version of object. White color for me are boolean cutters. Other colors means helpers and temp meshes. When I started to do bigger project in MoI I`ve found that I need those coloring feature. I don`t know is it good for MoI or not.
I only say that for me foders and colors are helpful. I feel that notes would be also helpful when you would like to repeat operation once again and you don`t remember past values.



edit: please note also that Modo layers are written bolder text when on layer is present some geometry. If layer are written with thin text (like in my example above) it means that those layers are empty. In MoI there is no such a problem because without geometry is no object :) - no empty layers (what is not bad).

Image Attachments:
folder_tree.jpg 


From: Michael Gibson
24 Mar 2021   [#86] In reply to [#85]
HI mdesign, thanks for the additional info. Folders definitely make sense to me but the colors seem pretty weird, I'll have to let that settle in for a while.

- Michael
From: beanworks
24 Mar 2021   [#87] In reply to [#27]
for what its worth I really like the way MOI styles work. I prefer it to layers any day. Carry on.


One more thing:

Michael,
Would you ever consider implementing a feature set for mating surfaces, motion constraints, and simple simulations to analyze part interference? Its possibly the only thing I really miss about working in Solidworks.
From: Michael Gibson
24 Mar 2021   [#88] In reply to [#87]
Hi beanworks,

re:
> Would you ever consider implementing a feature set for mating surfaces, motion constraints,
> and simple simulations to analyze part interference? Its possibly the only thing I really miss
> about working in Solidworks.

That's not an area I have much experience or expertise in so sorry no simulation and interference testing is not likely to be a direct function in MoI.

- Michael
From: mdesign
24 Mar 2021   [#89] In reply to [#88]
@Michael:
What about only position/align parts with face-face way with given offset value:
https://youtu.be/xtZhw4egOGM?t=2512
It`s used in assemblies but I think it would be also nice way of positioning things when you hit two faces and both objects are aligned perpendicularly according both selected faces. It works nicely also on circular faces (f.e. bolts in holes).

I know there are many ways of doing that but having that feature with present offset value could be also useful IMO.

@beanwork:
If you have Rhino then you should consider buying Bongo for IK mechanical animation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWtekHNl894
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grAN2_BxNFQ
It`s animation not simulation but I think it`s quite similar.

If you don`t have Rhino then maybe FreeCAD will be able to simulate MoI3d models as you want:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1jigCuD9jM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-wYmGekF2c
version 0.19 of FreeCAD was released few days ago and it`s quite nice to try (and free).
I`ve tried it lately because I wanted to use it together with MoI3d and Rhino.
I`ve imported some MoI3d parts into FreeCAD as step files and it worked quite well.

Cheers!!!
From: mdesign
24 Mar 2021   [#90]
@Michael: one more thing :) I`ve thought also about adding something to show naked edges as built-in solution (button) not external script. I think it would be easier for newbies for tracing geometry errors.
From: Michael Gibson
25 Mar 2021   [#91] In reply to [#89]
Hi mdesign,

re:
> What about only position/align parts with face-face way with given offset value:

Do you mean as a transform tool or as a constraint in a constraint solving system like in the vid you linked?

You can do it as a transform tool currently using the Transform > Orient command. To get your offset value, before you pick the base point type in r0,0,offset (like r0,0,5 for offset of 5) and that will alter the base point to be at +5 along the base face's surface normal.

Here's an example orienting 2 parts by face-face picks with offset value of 25:



- Michael
From: Michael Gibson
25 Mar 2021   [#92] In reply to [#90]
Hi mdesign,

re:
> @Michael: one more thing :) I`ve thought also about adding something to show naked edges as built-in solution (button)
> not external script. I think it would be easier for newbies for tracing geometry errors.

There is a built in function for it in v4 currently, under the detailed object properties dialog.

It gives a report in there on the number of joined and naked edges in an object and all of the labels in the report are clickable, if you click on any of them it will select the corresponding objects.



In v5 there will be another way to do it as well using the Scene Browser. There will be various sub types like you'll be able to go under Edges and use the entry for Naked edges to target them.

- Michael

Show messages:  1-12  13-32  33-52  53-72  73-92  93-112  113-132  133-152  …  633-639