Hi Burr,
> If you have some idea of your future analysis "extended properties" ui that may handle this,
> then I can look forward to that.
Yup, I do have some ideas along those lines for the future.
> But I hope you see my point about the fact that it failed being an "information point" for
> me. It didn't tell me details about "what", but I can make educated decisions from that point.
Sure, I do understand that. But it's just not really practical for me to focus on keeping modeling operation failures around for a kind of "side effect" like that...
> Does the new extrude have a "slightly out" area?
The new extrude does have a "slightly out" area but the amount of it is so extremely minimal (around 0.0000000000001 units...) that I don't think it can really make any difference in any practical way... There are plenty of other things like general surface/surface intersection that are going to end up looser than that anyway. If an error of that tiny amount is not acceptable you would probably have to build things only out of planes and cylinders and nothing else.
> Or does it now think it's planar?
It will now consider these 2 to be coplanar. It did think that they were each planar before, but not that they were on the same plane.
- Michael
|