Yeah, for array curve (not grid or circular), there is that point on the curve available as an origin point. But using that would mean that an object that was to the side of the curve would get progressively moved closer to the curve on every scaling, instead of it scaling "in place".

It kind of feels odd to me to put in scaling as an option just only for array curve - I mean right now array curve does not have other "per step" options for additional movements (like Array Circular)... Why scaling and not movement and/or rotation options per-step? Is uniform scale enough or does it need separate scales in x/y/z ...

It just doesn't quite feel right.

- Michael