Hi James,

re:
> It is my understanding that the points displayed with "show pts" function are not addressable by
> scripting (or with nodes) because they do not have unique identification. Is that right?

Yes, that's correct.


> Would it be a difficult task to tag each with random identifier so that a surface or curve may be
> manipulateded, say for example with Points/movePts node, without needing to first be covered
> to a pointArray & reconverted back after transformation?

The problem is that this could substantially increase the amount of memory consumed. Anything like this needs some careful analysis and testing on what happens with a file that has surfaces with a lot of control points in it, that's why it hasn't been implemented yet.

- Michael