> I think yes:-)

It looks like this will be possible for the next beta, the way I've got it right now is if you select all the objects to merge on the first boolean intersection prompt, and then push "done" without selecting anything for the second set, it will do this merge operation instead of the regular intersection.

This also allows it to work with solids, which I think seems pretty useful because it allows for this in one operation now:





This type of merge with a solid and a surface allows you to get 2 solids in one easy operation. I may end up duplicating some of this behavior inside of boolean difference as well, when differencing solids with surfaces.

I think I'm going to try a couple other boolean tuneups now as well.

- Michael