I’m not so sure about that. A nice website might help increase the number of trial downloads, but converting those downloads into sales is more complicated than that. I don't think people will blindly buy software without evaluating the learning curve first, and I guess these days the first reflex is watching youtube content. (But ... it's not my field so). Sadly there isn't much recent content, and when there is, you always have a moron suggesting to use Plasticity.

For me, coming from MoI, the 'only' things that Plasticity do better is surfacing, and the Parasolid kernel makes fillet job insanely easy (the patch function is also very neat). Sure as Michael point out, we start to see scenario where ACIS shows his power too, but overall the simple conic mode is amazingly fast and permissive. But for almost everything else, I wish Plasticity was a real MoI clone, but obviously (and hopefully) it isn't.

For people coming from poly modeling, trying to make hard surface assets and the like, those "easy fillet" makes a whole difference compared to 'old (pre-ACIS)' MoI. I know for a fact it was always the friction point when I showcased MoI to co worker (game industry). Gosh those guys like round fillets everywhere like if everything was made with surface subdivision, even if they are work around like round edge shader.

That said I'm talking from a very niche industry, but looking at the thousands of guns posted in Plasticity discord, it does seems representative of the current usage ... (and usually the problematic part is when it's time to model the handle ...)

edit : that github clone is indeed pretty lame, looks like there is a good bunch of miss behaviour that generate this ranting thread !